Page 87 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 87

82  Section I: Diagnostics and Planning

           disc herniations, and intramedullary neoplasms tend to be focal   5  Widmer WR. Iohexol and iopamidol: new contrast media for veterinary myelogra­
           lesions while inflammatory disease is often multifocal and may be   phy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989;194:1714–1716.
           associated with meningeal enhancement. Lack of signal from the   6  Widmer  WR,  Blevins  W. Veterinary  myelography: a  review  of  contrast  media,
                                                               adverse effects, and technique. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991;27:163–177.
           CSF on this sequence has also been associated with meningitis [40].   7  Fatone G, Lamagna F, Pasolini MP, Potena A, Brunetti A. Myelography in the dog
           Ischemia frequently affects one half of the spinal cord.  with  non‐ionic  contrast  media  at different iodine concentrations.  J Small Anim
            Myelomalacia can  occur  with severe  exogenous  trauma or   Pract 1997;38:292–294.
           intervertebral disc herniation. Spinal cord swelling and opacifica­  8  DeLahunta A, Glass E. Veterinary Neuroanatomy and Clinical Neurology, 3rd edn.
                                                               St Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008.
           tion of the spinal cord during myelography can be seen in dogs with   9  Lamb CR. Common difficulties with myelographic diagnosis of acute interverte­
           myelomalacia [75]. Spinal cord opacification can be subtle, and   bral disc disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1994;35:549–558.
           therefore CT post myelography may be a more sensitive indicator of   10  Barone G, Ziemer LS, Shofer FS, Steinberg SA. Risk factors associated with devel­
           myelomalacia than myelography alone. Characteristics of myelo­  opment of seizures after use of iohexol for myelography in dogs: 182 cases (1998). J
           malacia on MRI are those of severe edema (T2 hyperintensity) or   Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:1499–1502.
           hemorrhage [56].                                  11  da Costa RC, Parent JM, Dobson H. Incidence of and risk factors for seizures after
                                                               myelography performed with iohexol in dogs: 503 cases (2002–2004). J Am Vet Med
                                                               Assoc 2011;238:1296–1300.
                                                             12  McKee WM, Penderis J, Dennis R. Radiology corner: obstruction of contrast medium
           Conclusions                                         flow during cervical myelography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:342–343.
           Although it is generally accepted that MRI is superior to myelogra­  13  Kirberger RM, Roos CJ, Lubbe AM. The radiological diagnosis of thracolumbar
                                                               disc disease in the Dachshund. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1992;33:255–261.
           phy and CT for neuroimaging, it is important to recognize that for   14  McCartney WT. Lumbar myelography in 79 dogs, using different puncture sites.
           many spinal problems all these tests have similar sensitivities and   Vet Rec 1997;141:417–419.
           specificities.  Additionally,  for certain  problems such  as spinal   15  Tilmant L, Ackerman N, Spencer CP. Mechanical aspects of subarachnoid space
           trauma the superior spatial resolution of CT can be advantageous.   puncture in the dog. Vet Radiol 1984;50:227–232.
           Therefore, when MRI is not readily available or cost‐effective these   16  Kishimoto M, Yamada K, Ueno H, Kobayashi Y, Wisner ER. Spinal cord effects
                                                               from lumbar myelographic injection technique in the dog.  J Vet Med Sci
           other modalities remain appropriate options for imaging spinal dis­  2004;66:67–69.
           ease in the dog and cat.                          17  Kirberger RM, Wrigley RH. Myelography in the dog: review of patients with con­
            Numerous studies have compared myelography, unenhanced CT,   trast medium in the central canal. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1993;34:253–258.
           contrast‐enhanced CT, CT myelography, and MRI for the evalua­  18  Lexmaulova L, Zatloukal J, Proks P, Dvorak M, Srnec R, Rauser P et al. Incidence of
                                                               seizures associated with iopamidol or iomeprol myelography in dogs with interver­
           tion of intervertebral disc disease [25,26,29–31,51]. All studies are   tebral disk disease: 161 cases (2000–2002). J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2009;19:611–616.
           limited by the fact that the gold standard used is surgery. It is not   19  Carroll GL, Keene BW, Forrest LJ. Asystole associated with iohexol myelography in
           practical or ethical to explore all potential sites of intervertebral disc   a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997;38:284–287.
           extrusion in clinical patients and it is possible, although unlikely,   20  Lamb CR. The dorsoventral cervical myelogram.  Vet  Radiol  Ultrasound
                                                               1995;36:201–202.
           that sites of intervertebral disc extrusion are not detected with any   21  Matteucci ML, Ramirez O III, Thrall DE. Radiographic diagnosis: effect of right vs.
           modality and that false‐negative results occur. As a result surgery as   left lateral recumbency on myelographic appearance of a lateralized extradural
           a gold standard results in bias [26,44].            mass. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999;40:351–352.
            In spite of these limitations it is generally accepted that MRI is the   22  Nykamp S, Scrivani P. Feline myelography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:532–533.
           best imaging modality for the assessment of spinal cord disease and   23  Seiler G, Kinns J, Dennison S, Saunders J, Schwarz T. Vertebral column and spinal
                                                               cord. In: Schwarz T, Saunders J (eds) Veterinary Computed Tomography. Chichester,
           when available and cost is not a concern should be the recommended   West Sussex: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2011: 209–228.
           test. However, CT, CT myelography, and myelography all have an   24  Kinns J, Malinowski R, McEvoy F, Schwarz T, Zwingenberger A. Special software
           acceptable sensitivity and specificity in the detection of intervertebral   applications. In: Schwarz T, Saunders J (eds) Veterinary Computed Tomography.
           disc herniation and can be used when MRI is not available or afford­  Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2011: 67–74.
           able. Additionally, the information from all modalities can be com­  25  Hecht S, Thomas WB, Marioni‐Henry K, Echandi RL, Matthews AR, Adams WH.
                                                               Myelography vs. computed tomography in the evaluation of acute thoracolumbar
           plementary and a multimodality approach may be required for some   intervertebral disk extrusion in chondrodystrophic dogs.  Vet Radiol  Ultrasound
           diseases. Although MRI can provide information regarding progno­  2009;50:353–359.
           sis, it has also been shown that the choice of imaging test does not   26  Newcomb B, Arble J, Rochat M, Pechman R, Payton M. Comparison of computed
           correlate with patient outcome [45,59,76].          tomography and myelography to a reference standard of computed tomographic
                                                               myelography for evaluation of dogs with intervertebral disc disease.  Vet Surg
                                                               2012;41:207–214.
                  Video clips to accompany this book can be found on   27  Sharp NJH, Cofone M, Robertson ID, DeCarlo A, Smith GK, Thrall DE. Computed
                  the companion website at:                    tomography in the evaluation of caual cervical spondylomyopathy of the Doberman
                                                               Pinscher. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1995;36:100–108.
                  www.wiley.com/go/shores/neurosurgery       28  Hara Y, Tagawa M, Ejima H, Orima H, Fujita M. Usefulness of computed tomogra­
                                                               phy after myelography for surgery on dogs with cervical intervertebral disc protru­
                                                               sion. J Vet Med Sci 1994;56:791–794.
                                                             29  Dennison SE, Drees R, Rylander H, Yandell BS, Milovancev M, Pettigrew R, et al.
           References                                          Evaluation of different computed tomography techniques and myelography for the
           1  Gibbons S, Macias C, De Stefani A, Pinchbeck G, McKee W. The value of oblique   diagnosis of acute canine myelopathy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:254–258.
            versus ventrodorsal myelographic  views for lesion lateralisation in  canine thora­  30  Drost WT, Love NE, Berry CR. Comparison of radiography, myelography and
            columbar disc disease. J Small Anim Pract 2006;47:658–662.  computed tomography for the evaluation of canine vertebral and spinal cord
           2  Tanaka H, Nakayama M, Takase K. Usefulness of myelography with multiple views   tumors in sixteen dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1996;37:28–33.
            in diagnosis of circumferential location of disc material in dogs with thoracolumber   31  Israel SK, Levine JM, Kerwin SC, Levine GJ, Fosgate GT. The relative sensitivity of
            intervertebral disc herniation. J Vet Med Sci 2004;66:827–833.  computed tomography and myelography for identification of thoracolumbar
           3  Widmer WR, Thrall D. Canine and feline intervertebral disc disease, myelography,   intervertebral disk herniations in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009;50:247–252.
            and spinal cord diseases. In: Thrall D (ed.)  Textbook of Veteirnary Diagnostic   32  Shimizu J, Yamada K, Mochida K, Kako T, Muroya N, Teratani Y et al. Comparison
            Radiology, 5th edn. St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier, 2007.  of the diagnosis of intervertebral disc herniation in dogs by CT before and after
           4  Wheeler S, Davies J. Iohexol myelography in the dog and cat: a series of one hundred   contrast enhancement of the subarachnoid space. Vet Rec 2009;165:200–202.
            cases, and a comparison with metrizamide and iopamidol.  J Small Anim Pract   33  Bettmann MA. Angiographic contrast agents: conventional and new media com­
            1985;26:247–256.                                   pared. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;139:787–794.
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92