Page 88 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 88

Chapter 7: Advanced Imaging: Spinal Surgery  83

               34  Vance A, Nelson M, Hofmeister EH. Adverse reactions following administration of   and characterization of thoracolumbar myelopathy caoused by intervertebrak disk
                 an ionic iodinated contrast media in anesthetized dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc   herniation in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014;55:182–189.
                 2012;48:172–175.                                 56  Platt SR, McConnell JF, Bestbier M. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of
               35  Dennis R, Herrtage ME. Low osmolar contrast media: a review.  Vet Radiol   ascending hemorrhagic myelomalacia in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006;47: 78–82.
                 1989;30:2–12.                                    57  Penning V, Platt SR, Dennis R, Cappello R, Adams V. Association of spinal cord
               36  Wallack S. The Handbook of Veterinary Contrast Radiography. Solana Beach, CA:   compression seen on magnetic resonance imaging with clinical outcome in 67 dogs
                 San Diego Veterinary Imaging, Inc., 2003.          with thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion.  J  Small  Anim  Pract 2006;47:
               37  Holland M. Contrast agents.  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract   644–650.
                 1993;23:269–279.                                 58  Mankin JM, Hecht S, Thomas WB. Agreement between T2 and HASTE sequences
               38  Dennis R. Optimal magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Vet Radiol Ultrasound   in the evaluation of thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disease in dogs. Vet Radiol
                 2011;52(1 Suppl 1):S72–S80.                        Ultrasound 2012;53:162–166.
               39  D’Anjou  MA,  Carmel  EN,  Tidwell  AS.  Value  of  fat  suppression  in  gadolinium‐  59  Levine JM, Fosgate GT, Chen AV, Rushing R, Nghiem PP, Platt SR et al. Magnetic
                 enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;     resonance imaging in dogs with neurologic impairment due to acute thoracic and
                 52(1 Suppl 1):S85–S90.                             lumbar intervertebral disk herniation. J Vet Intern Med 2009;23:1220–1226.
               40  Pease A, Sullivan S, Olby N, Galano H, Cerda‐Gonzalez S, Robertson ID et al. Value   60  Kippenes H, Silver GM, Gavin P, Bagley RS, Tucker R. Magnetic resonance imaging
                 of a single‐shot turbo spin‐echo pulse sequence for assessing the architecture of the   of extradural spinal cord masses: distinguishing contrast‐enhancing disc disease
                 subarachnoid space and the constitutive nature of cerebrospinal fluid. Vet Radiol   from neoplasia [Astract]. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:572.
                 Ultrasound 2006;47:254–259.                      61  Freeman AC, Platt SR, Kent M, Howerth E, Holmes SP. Magnetic resonance imag­
               41  Tidwell AS, Specht A, Blaeser L, Kent M. Magnetic resonance imaging features of   ing enhancement of intervertebral disc disease in 30 dogs following chemical fat
                 extradural hematomas assoicated with intervertebral disc herniation in a dog.   saturation. J Small Anim Pract 2012;53:120–125.
                 Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:319–324.           62  Lang J. Flexion–extension myelography of the canine cauda equina.  Vet Radiol
               42  Robertson I, Thrall DE. Imaging dogs with suspected disc herniation: pros and   1988;29:242–257.
                 cons of myelography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. Vet Radiol   63  Ramirez O III, Thrall DE. A review of imaging techniques for canine cauda equina
                 Ultrasound 2011;52(1 Suppl 1):S81–S84.             syndrome. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998;39:283–296.
               43  Olby N, Dyce J, Houlton J. Correlation of plain radiographic and lumbar myelo­  64  Jones JC, Sorjonen DC, Simpson ST, Coates JR, Lenz S, Hathcock J et  al.
                 graphic findings in thoracolumbar disc disease.  J Small Anim Pract   Comparison between computed tomographic and surgical findings in nine large‐
                 1994;35:345–350.                                   breed dogs with lumbosacral stenosis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1996;37:247–256.
               44  Schulz KS, Walker M, Moon M, Waldron D, Slater M, McDonald DE. Correlation   65  Jones JC, Shires PK, Inzana KD, Sponenberg DP, Massicotte C, Renberg W et al.
                 of clinical, radiographic, and surgical localization of intervertebral disc extrusion in   Evaluation of canine lumbosacral stenosis using intravenous contrast‐enhanced
                 small‐breed dogs: a prospective study of 50 cases. Vet Surg 1998;27:105–111.  computed tomography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999;40:108–114.
               45  Parry AT, Harris A, Upjohn MM, Chandler K, Lamb CR. Does choice of imaging   66  Adams WH, Daniel GB, Pardo AD, Selcer RR. Magnetic resonance imaging of the
                 modality affect outcome in dogs with thoracolumbar spinal conditions? J Small   caudal lumbar and lumbosacral spine in 13 dogs (1990–1993).  Vet Radiol
                 Anim Pract 2010;51:312–317.                        Ultrasound 1995;36:3–13.
               46  Taeymans O, Saunders JH, vanBree H. Radiology corner: canine myelography. Vet   67  deHaan JJ, Shelton SB, Ackerman N. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis
                 Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:550–551.                 of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in four dogs. Vet Surg 1993;22:1–4.
               47  Bos AS, Brisson BA, Holmberg DL, Nykamp SG. Use of the ventrodorsal myelo­  68  De Decker S, Gielen IMVL, Duchateau L, Corzo‐Menéndez N, van Bree HJJ,
                 graphic view to predict lateralization of extruded disk material in small‐breed dogs   Kromhout K et al. Intraobserver, interobserver, and intermethod agreement for
                 with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion: 104 cases (2004–2005). J Am Vet   results of myelography, computed tomography‐myelography, and low‐field mag­
                 Med Assoc 2007;230:1860–1865.                      netic resonance imaging in dogs with disk‐associated wobbler syndrome. J Am Vet
               48  Scrivani PV, Barthez PY, Leveille R. The fallibility of the myelographic “double line”   Med Assoc 2011;238:1601–1608.
                 sign. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1996;37:264–265.     69  da Costa RC, Parent J, Dobson H, Holmberg D, Partlow G. Comparison of mag­
               49  Stickle R, Lowrie C, Oakley R. Radiology corner: another example of the myelo­  netic resonance imaging and myelography in 18 Doberman pinscher dogs with
                 graphic “double line” sign. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998;39:543.  cervical spondylomyelopathy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006;47:523–531.
               50  Duval J, Dewey C, Roberts R, Aron D. Spinal cord swelling as a myelographic indi­  70  Martin‐Vaquero P, da Costa RC. Magnetic resonance imaging features of Great
                 cator of prognosis: a retrospective study in dogs with intervertebral disc disease and   Danes with and without clincial signs of cervical spondylomyelopathy. J Am Vet
                 loss of deep pain perception. Vet Surg 1996;25:6–12.  Med Assoc 2014;245:393–400.
               51  Olby NJ, Munana KR, Sharp NJH, Thrall DE. The computed tomographic appear­  71  Martin‐Vaquero P, da Costa RC, Drost WT. Comparison of noncontrast computed
                 ance of acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc herniations in dogs. Vet Radiol   tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great
                 Ultrasound 2000;41:396–402.                        Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014;55:496–505.
               52  Newcomb B, Arble J, Rochat M, Pechman R, Payton M. Comparison of computed   72  Ohshio I, Hatayama A, Kaneda K, Takahara M, Nagashima K. Correlation between
                 tomography and myelography to a reference standard of computed tomographic   histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions.
                 myelography for evaluation of dogs with intervertebral disc disease.  Vet Surg   Spine 1993;18:1140–1149.
                 2011;41:207–214.                                 73  Suri A, Chabbra RPS, Mehta VS, Gaikwad S, Pandey RM. Effect of intramedullary
               53  Schroeder R, Pelsue DH, Park RD, Gasso D, Bruecker KA. Contrast‐enhanced CT   signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic mye­
                 for localizing compressive thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion. J Am Anim   lopathy. Spine J 2003;3:33–45.
                 Hosp Assoc 2011;47:203–209.                      74  Sande RD. Radiography, myelography, computed tomography, and magnetic reso­
               54  Bos AS, Brisson BA, Nykamp SG, Poma R, Foster RA. Accuracy, intermethod   nance imaging of the spine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992;22:811–831.
                 agreement, and inter‐reviewer agreement for use of magnetic resonance   75  Lu D, Lamb CR, Targett MP. Results of myelography in seven dogs with myeloma­
                 imaging and myelography in small‐breed dogs with naturally occurring   lacia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:326–330.
                 first‐time intervertebral disk extrusion.  J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012;240:   76  Ito  D, Matsunaga S,  Jeffery  ND,  Sasaki  N, Nishimura  R, Mochizuki  M et  al.
                 969–977.                                           Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in dogs with paraplegia caused by
               55  Cooper JJ, Young BD, Griffin JF, Fosgate GT, Levine LM. Comparison between   thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion: 77 cases (2000–2003). J Am Vet Med
                 noncontrast computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for detection   Assoc 2005;227:1454–1460.
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93