Page 257 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 257

CHAPTER 12   Thromboembolic Disease   229


            by anti-Xa activity (see  Box 12.3). Optimal anti-Xa activ-  is human recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA).
            ity level in cats is not known; the target range in people is   rt-PA is a single-chain polypeptide serine protease with a
  VetBooks.ir  reported as 0.5 to 1 U/mL, although 0.3 to 0.6 U/mL has also    higher specificity for fibrin within thrombi and a low affinity
                                                                 for circulating plasminogen. The risk of hemorrhage is there-
            been used.
              The LMWH products have differences in biologic and
                                                                 vators such as streptokinase and urokinase. However, there
            clinical effects and are not interchangeable. The most effec-  fore less with rt-PA than with nonspecific plasminogen acti-
            tive dosage for the various LMWH products is not clearly   remains the potential for serious bleeding, reperfusion
            established in dogs and cats. Commonly used dosages of   injury, and neurologic adverse effects. rt-PA also is poten-
            dalteparin sodium and enoxaparin (see Box 12.3) have been   tially antigenic in animals because it is a human protein.
            extrapolated  from human  use. Although enoxaparin pro-  Veterinary experience with rt-PA is limited, it is relatively
            duces anti-Xa activity close to target range at 4 hours post-  expensive, and the optimal dosage is not known; the most
            dose in cats, activity is generally undetectable 8 hours later.   commonly used dose is 5 mg per cat, generally given as a
            This finding led to the presumption that higher and more   front-loaded IV infusion over 1 to 2 hours (see Box 12.3). In
            frequent doses should be used to maintain anti-Xa levels   a case series of 11 cats with ATE, rt-PA administration was
            closer to human target range. However, this rationale is dis-  associated with improved limb function and return of pulses;
            puted because it does not appear necessary to maintain peak   however, there was a high rate of adverse effects related to
            or target anti-Xa levels throughout the dosing period. Indeed,   reperfusion injury (azotemia, hyperkalemia, and neurologic
            an experimental study of enoxaparin in a modified venous   signs), and mortality was high. Thus although rt-PA can
            stasis model in healthy cats showed no correlation between   effectively break down clots, a clear survival advantage has
            antithrombotic effect and anti-Xa levels; in this model, anti-  not been shown. If used, this therapy is best instituted within
            thrombotic effect of enoxaparin lasted  >12 hours. The   3 to 4 hours of vascular occlusion. An intensive care setting,
            optimal therapeutic range in cats and the most effective   including frequent monitoring of serum potassium concen-
            dosage in cats with ATE remain unknown. LMWHs are rela-  tration, acid-base status, and electrocardiogram (ECG), is
            tively expensive and require owner compliance to administer   important to detect reperfusion-induced hyperkalemia and
            SC injections every 12 to 24 hours.                  metabolic acidosis. The risk-to-benefit profile of thrombo-
              Warfarin was historically the most common long-term   lytic treatment may be more favorable in patients with brain,
            anticoagulant treatment for cats with ATE. However, due to   renal, or splanchnic thromboembolism. Other thrombolyt-
            serious risk of bleeding, requirement for frequent monitor-  ics, including the nonspecific plasminogen activators strep-
            ing, and availability of alternative anticoagulants (including   tokinase and urokinase, are associated with even more severe
            LMWH), warfarin is now rarely used in cats. Warfarin is still   side effects and higher mortality, and are not currently
            sometimes used in large dogs with systemic TE (see pg. 232)   recommended.
            if other agents are cost-prohibitive.                  Surgical thromboembolus removal is typically not advised
              A number of new anticoagulant drugs have been devel-  in cats. The surgical risk is high, and significant neuromus-
            oped for human use and are becoming available for veteri-  cular ischemic injury is likely to have already occurred by
            nary patients. In people, these drugs offer similar or improved   the time of surgery. Percutaneous clot removal using an
            antithrombotic efficacy compared with warfarin, with fewer   embolectomy catheter has not been effective in cats.
            side effects. Synthetic factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., rivaroxaban,   In general, the prognosis for cats with ATE is poor. Many
            apixiban, fondaparinux) potentiate effects of AT without   cats are euthanized on presentation (approximately   1 3  of
            affecting thrombin or platelet function. Their effect is moni-  cats in reports from tertiary care facilities, and nearly   2 3
            tored via anti-Xa activity measurement because they do not   of cats in a primary care setting). Of cats where treatment is
            affect results of routine coagulation tests. Fondaparinux is   attempted, approximately half survive the initial ATE episode
            given SC, whereas apixaban and rivaroxaban are both oral.   regardless of therapy chosen (conservative or thrombolytic).
            Doses for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and fondaparinux in cats   Survival is better if only one limb is involved and/or if some
            have been published based on pharmacokinetics and anti-Xa   motor function is preserved at presentation. Hypothermia
            activity in healthy cats; however, clinical efficacy in cats with   and CHF at presentation are both associated with poor sur-
            ATE has yet to be investigated. Dabigatran etexilate is an oral   vival in cats. Other negative factors can include hyperphos-
            direct thrombin inhibitor; use of this medication has not   phatemia, progressive hyperkalemia or azotemia, bradycardia,
            been reported in veterinary medicine.                persistent lack of motor function, progressive limb injury
              All treatments for ATE discussed thus far are supportive   (continued muscle contracture after  2-3  days, necrosis),
            rather than directed therapy; the common approach is essen-  severe LA enlargement, presence of intracardiac thrombi or
            tially to support the cat while the patient’s own intrinsic   spontaneous contrast (“swirling smoke”) on echocardio-
            fibrinolytic system breaks down the embolus, rather than   gram, DIC, and history of previous ATE. Significant embo-
            pursuing treatment specifically aimed at dissolving the clot.   lization of the kidneys, intestines, or other organs carries a
            However, thrombolytic drugs that directly promote clot lysis   grave prognosis.
            are available. These medications increase conversion of plas-  Barring complications, limb function should begin to
            minogen to plasmin, thus facilitating fibrinolysis. The most   return within days to a week. Some cats become clinically
            commonly used thrombolytic agent in veterinary medicine   normal within 1 to 2 months, although residual deficits can
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262