Page 272 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 272

244    PART II   Respiratory System Disorders


            interpreted in conjunction with results of nasal imaging, rhi-  Frontal sinus exploration should be considered in dogs
            noscopy, and nasal histology and culture.            with fluid or tissue opacity in the frontal sinus in the absence
  VetBooks.ir  agglutination capsular antigen test (LCAT). Because organ-  of a diagnosis. Aspergillosis, in particular, may be localized
              The  blood  test  of  choice  for  cryptococcosis  is  the  latex
                                                                 within the frontal sinus and may elude diagnosis through
            ism identification is usually possible in specimens from
                                                                   Exploratory rhinotomy with turbinectomy is the most
            infected organs, organism identification is the method of   rhinoscopy.
            choice for a definitive diagnosis. The LCAT is performed if   aggressive diagnostic test. Surgical exploration of the nose
            cryptococcosis is suspected but an extensive search for the   allows direct visualization of the nasal cavity for detecting
            organism has failed. The LCAT is also performed in animals   the presence of foreign bodies, mass lesions, or fungal mats
            with a confirmed diagnosis as a means of monitoring thera-  and for obtaining biopsy and culture specimens. The poten-
            peutic response (see Chapter 97).                    tial benefits of surgery, however, should be weighed against
              Most often, computed tomography (CT) or nasal radiog-  the potential complications associated with rhinotomy and
            raphy, rhinoscopy, and biopsy are required to establish a   turbinectomy. The Suggested Readings section offers surgical
            diagnosis of intranasal disease in dogs and cats in which   references.
            acute viral infection is not suspected. Dental radiographs
            should also be obtained if a diagnosis is not obvious from
            CT or rhinoscopy, as they can be more sensitive for detecting   SNEEZING
            tooth root disease than CT. These diagnostic tests are per-
            formed with the dog or cat under general anesthesia. CT   Etiology and Diagnostic Approach
            scans or nasal radiographs are obtained first, followed by oral   A sneeze is an explosive release of air from the lungs through
            examination and rhinoscopy, and then specimen collection.   the nasal cavity and mouth. It is a protective reflex that expels
            This order is recommended because results of CT or radiog-  irritants from the nasal cavity. Intermittent, occasional
            raphy and rhinoscopy are often useful in  the selection of   sneezing is considered normal. Persistent, paroxysmal sneez-
            biopsy sites. In addition, hemorrhage from biopsy sites could   ing should be considered abnormal. Disorders commonly
            obscure or alter radiographic and rhinoscopic detail if the   associated with acute-onset, persistent sneezing include
            specimen were collected first. However, in dogs and cats   nasal foreign body and feline upper respiratory infection.
            highly suspected of having acute foreign body inhalation,   The canine nasal mite, Pneumonyssoides caninum, and expo-
            rhinoscopy is performed first in the hopes of identifying and   sure to irritating aerosols are less common causes of sneez-
            removing  the  foreign  material.  (See  Chapter  14  for  more   ing. All nasal diseases considered as differential diagnoses
            detail on nasal radiography, CT, and rhinoscopy.)    for nasal discharge are also potential causes for sneezing;
              The combination of radiography, rhinoscopy, and nasal   however, animals with these diseases more often present
            biopsy has been reported to have a diagnostic success rate of   with nasal discharge as the primary complaint.
            approximately 80% in dogs; however, a diagnosis of idio-  The owners should be questioned carefully concerning
            pathic disease was considered a diagnostic success in dogs   possible recent exposure of the pet to foreign bodies (e.g.,
            without progressive signs. The success rate was closer to 50%   rooting in the ground, running through grassy fields) or
            if the diagnosis of idiopathic disease was excluded. It is more   irritants (powders and aerosols) or, in cats, exposure to respi-
            difficult to evaluate the success rate for cats. High propor-  ratory viruses through new cats or kittens. Sneezing is an
            tions of cats with chronic nasal discharge suffer from feline   acute phenomenon that often subsides with time. A foreign
            chronic rhinosinusitis (idiopathic rhinitis) and are diag-  body should not be excluded from the differential diagnoses
            nosed only through exclusion. Dogs with persistent signs in   just because sneezing subsides. In the dog a history of acute
            which a diagnosis cannot be obtained after the assessment   sneezing followed by the development of a nasal discharge is
            described earlier require further evaluation. Cats are evalu-  suggestive of a foreign body or progressive disease.
            ated further only if signs suggestive of another disease are   Other findings may help narrow the list of differential
            found during any part of the evaluation, or if the clinical   diagnoses. Dogs with foreign bodies or nasal mites may paw
            signs are progressive or intolerable to the owners.  at their nose. Foreign bodies are typically associated with
              Nasal CT is considered if not performed previously and   unilateral, mucopurulent nasal discharge, although serous or
            if a diagnosis has not been made. CT provides excellent   serosanguineous discharge may be present initially. Foreign
            visualization of all of the nasal sinuses and may allow iden-  bodies in the caudal nasopharynx may cause gagging, retch-
            tification of small masses that are not visible on nasal radi-  ing, or reverse sneezing. The nasal discharge associated with
            ography or rhinoscopy. CT is also more accurate than nasal   reactions to aerosols, powders, or other inhaled irritants is
            radiography in determining the extent of nasal tumors. Mag-  usually bilateral and serous in nature. In cats other clinical
            netic resonance imaging (MRI) may be more accurate than   signs supportive of a diagnosis of upper respiratory infec-
            CT in the assessment of soft tissues, such as nasal neoplasia.   tion, such as conjunctivitis and fever, may be present as well
            Dental radiographs should also be obtained if not previously   as a history of exposure to other cats or kittens.
            performed. In the absence of a diagnosis, nasal imaging   Dogs in which acute, paroxysmal sneezing develops should
            (preferably CT or MRI), dental radiographs, rhinoscopy, and   undergo prompt rhinoscopic examination (see Chapter 14).
            biopsy can be repeated after a 1- to 2-month period.  With time, foreign material may become covered with mucus
   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277