Page 420 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 420

386   Chapter 3


            of 18F‐NaF PET to equine imaging provides an opportu­  to identify structural cartilage defects of the fetlock joint in the
                                                                  horse. Vet J 2014;199:115–122.
            nity to combine the excellent bone structural representa­  12.  Katzman SA, Spriet M, Galuppo LD. Outcome following com­
  VetBooks.ir  acute bone changes. The combination of CT with PET   puted tomographic imaging and subsequent surgical removal of
            tion of CT with very sensitive information regarding
                                                                  keratomas in equids: 32 cases (2005–2016). J Am Vet Med Assoc
            potentially makes it the ideal technique for bone imaging.
                                                                  2019;254:266–274.
              CT also has a clear advantage over MRI residing in   13.  Knuchell JA, Spriet M, Galuppo LD, et al. Fracture of the central
            the  speed  of  acquisition,  allowing  imaging  of  larger   tarsal bone in nonracehorses: four cases. Vet Radiol Ultrasound
                                                                  2016;57:403–409.
            areas. For example, it is possible to image from the car­  14.  Kruger EF, Puchalski SM, Pollard RE, et  al. Measurement of
            pus to the distal extremity with CT in a couple of min­  equine laminar blood flow and vascular permeability by use of
            utes. Imaging this same area MRI would take hours and   dynamic contrast‐enhanced computed tomography. Am J Vet Res
            require multiple studies. The ability to image the distal   2008;69:371–377.
            limb standing has been an important factor to the devel­  15.  Launois MT, Vandeweerd JM, Perrin RA, et al. Use of computed
                                                                  tomography to diagnose  new bone formation associated  with
            opment of equine MRI. As a few CT concepts now sug­   desmitis of the proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament in
            gest that standing CT imaging might become more       third metacarpal or third metatarsal bones of three horses. J Am
            widely available, it is possible that the use of CT in the   Vet Med Assoc 2009;234:514–518.
            years to come will be drastically changed by technology   16.  Nelson BB, Kawcak CE, Goodrich LR, et al. Comparison between
                                                                  computed tomographic arthrography, radiography, ultrasonogra­
            evolution.                                            phy, and arthroscopy for the diagnosis of femorotibial joint dis­
                                                                  ease in western performance horses.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound
                                                                  2016;57:387–402.
                                                               17.  O’Brien T, Baker TA, Brounts SH, et  al. Detection of articular
            References                                            pathology of the distal aspect of the third metacarpal bone in
                                                                  thoroughbred racehorses: comparison of radiography, computed
             1.  Agass R, Dixon J, Fraser B. Computed tomographic contrast ten­  tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.  Vet Surg 2011;
               ography of the digital flexor tendon sheath of the equine hindlimb.   40:942–951.
               Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59:279–288.          18.  Olive J, D’Anjou MA, Alexander K, et al. Comparison of mag­
             2.  van Bree H, Van Rijssen B, Tshamala M, et al. Comparison of the   netic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radiogra­
               nonionic contrast agents, iopromide and iotrolan, for positive‐  phy for assessment of noncartilaginous changes in equine
               contrast arthrography of the scapulohumeral joint in dogs. Am J   metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;
               Vet Res 1992;53:1622–1626.                         51:267–279.
             3.  Brunisholz HP, Hagen R, Furst AE, et al. Radiographic and com­  19.  Puchalski SM, Galuppo LD, Hornof WJ, et al. Intraarterial con­
               puted tomographic configuration of incomplete proximal frac­  trast‐enhanced computed tomography of the equine distal extrem­
               tures of the proximal phalanx in horses not used for racing. Vet   ity. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:21–29.
               Surg 2015;44:809–815.                           20.  Spriet M, Espinosa P, Kyme AZ, et al. Positron emission tomogra­
             4.  Collins  JN,  Galuppo  LD, Thomas  HL,  et  al. Use  of  computed   phy of the equine distal limb: exploratory study.  Vet Radiol
               tomography angiography to evaluate the vascular anatomy of the   Ultrasound 2016;57:630–638.
               distal portion of the forelimb of horses.  Am J  Vet Res   21.  Spriet M, Espinosa P, Kyme AZ, et al. (18) F‐sodium fluoride posi­
               2004;65:1409–1420.                                 tron emission tomography of the equine distal limb: exploratory
             5.  Crijns CP, Martens A, Bergman HJ, et al. Intra‐modality and inter‐  study in three horses. Equine Vet J 2018;50:125–132.
                                                                                                  18
               modality agreement in radiography and computed tomography of   22.  Spriet M, Espinosa‐Mur P, Cissell DD, et al.  F‐sodium fluoride
               equine distal limb fractures. Equine Vet J, 2014;46:92–96  positron emission tomography of the racing Thoroughbred fet­
             6.  Eliasson P, Couppe C, Lonsdale M, et al. Ruptured human Achilles   lock: validation and comparison with other imaging modalities in
               tendon has elevated metabolic activity up to 1 year after repair.   nine horses. Equine  Vet J 2018;September. doi: https://doi.
               Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:1868–1877.      org/10.1111/evj.13019.
             7.  Gray SN, Puchalski SM, Galuppo LD. Computed tomographic   23.  Vallance SA, Bell RJ, Spriet M, et al. Comparisons of computed
               arthrography of the intercarpal ligaments of the equine carpus.   tomography, contrast enhanced computed tomography and stand­
               Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013;54:245–252.             ing low‐field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with lameness
             8.  Gunst S, Del Chicca F, Furst AE, et al. Central tarsal bone fractures in   localised to the foot. Part 1: anatomic visualisation scores. Equine
               horses not used for racing: computed tomographic configuration and long‐  Vet J 2012;44:51–56.
               term outcome of lag screw fixation. Equine Vet J 2016;48: 585–589.  24.  Vallance SA, Bell RJ, Spriet M, et al. Comparisons of computed
             9.  van  Hamel  SE,  Bergman  HJ,  Puchalski  SM,  et  al.  Contrast‐  tomography, contrast‐enhanced computed tomography and
               enhanced computed tomographic evaluation of the deep digital   standing low‐field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with
               flexor tendon in the equine foot compared to macroscopic and his­  lameness localised to the foot. Part 2: lesion identification. Equine
               tological findings in 23 limbs. Equine Vet J 2014;46:300–305.  Vet J 2012;44:149–156.
            10.  Hanson JA, Seeherman HJ, Kirker‐Head CA, et al. The role of   25.  Vekens EV, Bergman EH, Vanderperren K, et al. Computed tomo­
               computed  tomography in  evaluation  of  subchondral  osseous   graphic anatomy of the equine stifle joint. Am J Vet Res 2011;
               lesions in seven horses with chronic synovitis. Equine  Vet J   72:512–521.
               1996;28:480–488.                                26.  Whitton RC, Buckley C, Donovan T, et al. The diagnosis of lame­
            11.  Hontoir F, Nisolle JF, Meurisse H, et al. A comparison of 3‐T mag­  ness associated with distal limb pathology in a horse: a comparison
               netic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography   of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance
                                                                  imaging. Vet J 1998;155:223–229.
   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425