Page 463 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 463

Diagnostic Imaging   429


             149.  Rovel T, Audigié F, Coudry V, et al. Evaluation of standing low‐  172.  Smith S, Dyson SJ, Murray RC. Magnetic resonance imaging of
                 field magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of advanced distal   distal sesamoidean ligament injury.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound
                 interphalangeal primary degenerative joint disease in horses: 12
  VetBooks.ir  150.  Sampson SN, Tucker RL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the   173.  Smith M, Dyson S, Murray R. The appearance of the equine
                                                                     2008;49:516–528.
                 cases (2010–2014). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2019;254:257–265.
                                                                     metacarpophalangeal region on high‐field vs. standing low‐field
                                                                     magnetic resonance imaging.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;
                 proximal metacarpal and metatarsal regions. Clin Tech Equine
                 Pract 2007;6:78–85.
                                                                     52:61–70.
             151.  Sampson SN, Schneider RK, Tucker RL, et al. Magnetic reso­  174.  Smith MA, Dyson SJ, Murray RC. Reliability of high‐ and low‐
                 nance imaging features of oblique and straight distal sesamoid­  field magnetic resonance imaging systems for detection of carti­
                 ean desmitis in 27 horses.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;   lage and bone lesions in the equine cadaver fetlock. Equine Vet J
                 48:303–311.                                         2012;44:684–691.
             152.  Sampson SN, Schneider RK, Gavin PR, et  al. Magnetic reso­  175.  Smith AD, Morton AJ, Winter MD, et al. Magnetic resonance
                 nance imaging findings in horses with recent onset navicular   imaging scoring of an experimental model of post‐traumatic
                 syndrome but without radiographic abnormalities. Vet Radiol   osteoarthritis in the equine carpus.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound
                 Ultrasound 2009;50:339–346.                         2016;57:502–514.
             153.  Santos MP, Gutierrez‐Nibeyro SD, McKnight AL, et al. Gross   176.  Spriet S, McKnight A. Characterization of the magic angle effect
                 and histopathologic correlation of low‐field magnetic resonance   in the equine deep digital flexor tendon using a low‐field mag­
                 imaging findings in the stifle of asymptomatic horses. Vet Radiol   netic resonance system. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009;50:32–36.
                 Ultrasound 2015;56:407–416.                     177.  Spriet M, Zwingenberger A. Influence of the position of the foot
             154.  Saveraid TC, Judy CE. Use of intravenous gadolinium contrast   on MRI signal in the deep digital flexor tendon and collateral
                 in equine magnetic resonance imaging.  Vet Clin North  Am   ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint in the standing
                 Equine Pract 2012;28:617–636.                       horse. Equine Vet J 2009;41:498–503
             155.  Schiavo S, Cillán‐García E, Elce Y, et al. Horses with solar foot   178.  Spriet M, Mai W, McKnight A. Asymmetric signal intensity in
                 penetration,  deep  digital  flexor  tendon injury,  and  absence  of   normal collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint in
                 concurrent synovial sepsis can have a positive outcome.  Vet   horses with a low‐field MRI system due to the magic angle
                 Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59:697–704.                  effect. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:95–100.
             156.  Schramme M. Deep digital flexor tendonopathy in the equine   179.  Stöckl T, Schulze T, Brehm W, Gerlach K. Vergleichende bilat­
                 digit. Equine Vet Educ 2010;23:403–415.             erale magnetresonanztomographische Untersuchungen der
             157.  Schramme and Redding (2009) unpublished data.     Hufregion im Niederfeld‐MRT – Teil 2: Häufigkeit der Befunde
             158.  Schramme MC, Murray RM, Blunden TS, et al. A comparison   und deren Verteilung. Pferdeheilkunde 2013;29:303–311
                 between magnetic resonance imaging, pathology and radiology   180.  Suarez Sanchez‐Andrade J, Richter H, Kuhn K, et al. Comparison
                 in 34 limbs with navicular syndrome and 25 control limbs. Proc   between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography,
                 Am Assoc Equine Pract 2005;51: 348–358.             and arthrography to identify artificially induced cartilage defects
             159.  Schramme M, Kerekes Z, Hunter S, et al. Improved identifica­  of the equine carpal joints.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018;
                 tion of  the palmar  fibrocartilage of  the navicular  bone with   59:312–325.
                 saline magnetic resonance bursography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound   181.  Thomas AL, Schramme MC, Lepage OM, Segard EM. Low‐field
                 2009;50:606–614.                                    magnetic resonance imaging appearance of postarthroscopic
             160.  Schramme M, Kerekes Z, Hunter S, et al. MR imaging features   magnetic susceptibility artifacts in horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound
                 of surgically induced core lesions in the equine superficial digital   2016;57:587–593.
                 flexor tendon. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:280–287.  182.  Tranquille CA, Parkin TDH, Murray RC. Magnetic resonance
             161.  Schramme M, Josson A, Linder K. Characterization of the origin   imaging‐detected adaptation and pathology in the distal condyles
                 and body of the normal equine rear suspensory ligament using   of the third metacarpus, associated with lateral condylar fracture
                 ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and histology. Vet   in Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2012;44:699–706.
                 Radiol Ultrasound 2012;53:318–328.              183.  Tranquille A, Murray R, Parkin T. Can we use subchondral bone
             162.  Selberg K, Werpy N. Fractures of the distal phalanx and associ­  thickness on high‐field magnetic resonance images to identify
                 ated soft tissue and osseous abnormalities in 22 horses with   Thoroughbred racehorses at risk of catastrophic lateral condylar
                   ossified sclerotic ungual cartilages diagnosed with magnetic   fracture? Equine Vet J 2017;49:167–171.
                   resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52:394–401.  184.  Tucker RL, Sampson SN. Magnetic resonance imaging protocols
             163.  Sherlock CE, Mair TS. Magic angle effect on low field magnetic   for the horse. Clin Techn Equine Pract 2007;6:2–15
                 resonance images in the superficial digital flexor tendon in the   185.  Urraca del Junco CI, Shaw DJ, Weaver MP, Schwarz T. The value
                 equine proximal pastern region. Vet J 2016;217:126–131.  of radiographic screening for metallic particles in the equine foot
             164.  Sherlock CE, Kinns, J, Mair TS. Evaluation of foot pain in the   and size of related artifacts on low‐field MRI.  Vet Radiol
                 standing horse using magnetic resonance imaging.  Vet Rec   Ultrasound. 2011;52:634–639.
                 2007;161:739–744.                               186.  Urraca del Junco CI, Mair TS, Powell SE, et al. Magnetic reso­
             165.  Sherlock C, Mair T, Blunden T. Deep erosions of the palmar   nance imaging findings of equine solar penetration wounds. Vet
                 aspect of the navicular bone diagnosed by standing magnetic   Radiol Ultrasound 2012;53:71–75.
                 resonance imaging. Equine Vet J 2008;40:684–692.  187.  Waselau M. Magnetic resonance imaging of equine stifle disor­
             166.  Sherlock CE, Mair  TS, Braake F. Osseous lesions in the   ders  –  70 clinical cases (2011–2013). Proceedings of the
                 metacarpo(tarso)phalangeal  joint diagnosed  using  low‐field   American College of Veterinary Surgeons, 2014, San Diego, CA.
                 magnetic resonance imaging in standing horses.  Vet Radiol   188.  Werpy NM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine patient:
                 Ultrasound 2009;50:13–20.                           a comparison of high‐ and low‐field Systems. Clin Tech Equine
             167.  Sherlock CE, Eggleston RB, Peroni JF and Parks AH. Desmitis of   Pract 2007;6:37–45.
                 the medial tarsal collateral ligament in 7 horses. Equine Vet Educ   189.  Werpy NM. Diagnosis of middle phalanx bone marrow lesions
                 2012;24:72–80.                                      in horses using magnetic resonance imaging and identification of
             168.  Sill  V,  Skorka  A,  Gerhards  H,  Gerlach  K. Magnetreson­  phase effect cancellation for proper image interpretation. Equine
                 anztomographische Untersuchungen  der Hufregion am stehe­  Vet Educ 2009;21:125–130.
                 nden Pferd. Pferdeheilkunde 2011;27:39–48.      190.  Werpy NM Recheck magnetic resonance imaging examinations
             169.  Skelly‐Smith E, Ireland J, Dyson S. The centrodistal joint interos­  for evaluation of musculoskeletal injury. Vet Clinics North Am
                 seous ligament region in the tarsus of the horse: Normal appear­  Equine 2012;28:659–680.
                 ance, abnormalities and possible association with other tarsal   191.  Werpy N. The use of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagno­
                 lesions, including osteoarthritis. Equine Vet J 2016;48:457–465.  sis of osteomyelitis. Equine Vet Educ 2014; 26:15–17.
             170.  Smith MR, Wright IM. Endoscopic evaluation of the navicular   192.  Werpy NM, Ho CP, Kawcak CE. Magic angle effect in normal
                 bursa: observations, treatment and outcome in 92 cases with   collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint in horses
                 identified pathology. Equine Vet J 2012;44:339–345.  imaged with a high‐field magnetic resonance imaging system.
             171.  Smith MA, Dyson SJ, Murray RC. Is a magic angle effect   Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:2–10.
                 observed in the collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal   193.  Werpy NM, Ho CP, Pease AP, Kawcak CE. The effect of sequence
                 joint or the oblique  sesamoidean ligaments  during standing   selection and field strength on detection of osteochondral defects
                   magnetic resonance imaging? Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008;49:   in  the  metacarpophalangeal  joint.  Vet  Radiol  Ultrasound
                 509–515.                                            2011;52:154–160.
   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468