Page 460 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 460

426   Chapter 3


            11.  Biggi M, Dyson S. Hind foot lameness: results of magnetic   34.  Carstens A, Kirberger RM, Velleman M, et al. Feasibility for map­
                 resonance imaging in 38 horses (2001–2011). Equine  Vet J   ping cartilage T1 relaxation times in the distal metacarpus3/metatar­
                                                                  sus3 of thoroughbred racehorses using delayed gadolinium‐enhanced
  VetBooks.ir  12.  Biggi M, Dyson SJ. Use of high‐field and low‐field magnetic reso­  35.  Chandnani VP, Ho C, Chu P, et al. Knee hyaline cartilage evalu­
               2013;45:427–434.
                                                                  magnetic  resonance imaging  of cartilage  (dGEMRIC): normal
                                                                  cadaver study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013;54:365–372.
               nance imaging to describe the anatomy of the proximal portion of
               the tarsal region of non‐lame horses.  Am J  Vet Res 2018;
               79:299–310.
            13.  Biggi M, Zani DD, De Zani D, Di Giancamillo M. Magnetic reso­  ated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imag­
                                                                  ing sequences and intraarticular injection of Gadolinium and
               nance imaging findings of bone marrow lesions in the equine dis­  saline solution. Radiology 1991;178:557–561.
               tal tarsus. Equine Vet Educ 2012;24:236–241.    36.  Cohen JM, Schneider RK, Zubrod CJ, et al. Desmitis of the distal
            14.  Bischofberger AS, Konar M, Ohlertht S, et al. Magnetic resonance   digital annular ligament in seven horses: MRI diagnosis and surgi­
               imaging, ultrasonography and histology of the suspensory liga­  cal treatment. Vet Surg 2008;37:336–344.
               ment origin: a comparative study of normal anatomy of   37.  Contino E, Werpy N, Morton A, et al. Metacarpophalangeal joint
               Warmblood horses. Equine Vet J 2006;38:508–516.    lesions identified on magnetic resonance imaging with lameness
            15.  Bischofberger AS, Fürst AE, Torgerson PR, et al. Use of a 3‐Telsa   that resolves using palmar digital nerve and intra‐articular analge­
               magnet to perform delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic reso­  sia. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2012;58:534.
               nance imaging of the distal interphalangeal joint of horses with   38.  Daglish J, Frisbie DD, Selberg KT, et al. High field magnetic reso­
               and without naturally occurring osteoarthritis.  Am J  Vet Res   nance imaging is comparable with gross anatomy for description
               2018;79:287–298.                                   of the normal appearance of soft tissues in the equine stifle. Vet
            16.  Blaik MA, Hanson RR, Kincaid SA et al. Low‐field magnetic reso­  Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59:721–736.
               nance imaging of the equine tarsus: normal anatomy. Vet Radiol   39.  Dakin SG, Dyson SJ, Murray RC, et  al. Osseous abnormalities
               Ultrasound 2000;41:131–141.                        associated with collateral desmopathy of the distal interphalan­
            17.  Blunden TS, Dyson SJ, Murray RM et al. Histopathology in horses   geal joint: part 1. Equine Vet J 2009;41:786–793
               with chronic palmar foot pain and age‐matched controls. Part 1:   40.  Daniel AJ, Judy CE, Rick MC, et al. Comparison of radiography,
               navicular bone and related structures. Equine  Vet J 2006;   nuclear scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging for detec­
               38:15–22.                                          tion of specific conditions of the distal tarsal bones of horses: 20
            18.  Blunden TS, Dyson SJ, Murray RM et al. Histopathology in horses   cases (2006–2010). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012;240:1109–1114.
               with chronic palmar foot pain and age‐matched controls. Part 2:   41.  Daniel A, Judy C, Saveraid T. Magnetic resonance imaging of the
               the deep digital flexor tendon. Equine Vet J 2006;38:23–27.  metacarpo(tarso)phalangeal region in clinically lame horses
            19.  Blunden A, Murray R, Dyson S. Lesions of the deep digital flexor   responding to diagnostic analgesia of the palmar nerves at the
               tendon in the digit: a correlative MRI and post mortem study in   base of the proximal sesamoid bones: five cases. Equine Vet Educ
               control and lame horses. Equine Vet J 2009;41:25–33.  2013;25:222–228.
            20.  Boado A, Kristoffersen M, Dyson S, et al. Use of nuclear scintigra­  42.  Davis W, Caniglia CJ, Lustgarten M, et al. Clinical and diagnostic
               phy and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose chronic pene­  imaging characteristics of lateral digital flexor tendinitis within
               trating  wounds in the  equine foot. Equine vet  Educ  2005;   the tarsal sheath in four horses.  Vet Radiol Ultrasound
               17:62–68.                                          2014;55:166–173.
            21.  Bolen G, Haye D, Dondelinger R, Busoni V. Magnetic resonance   43.  De Guio C, Ségard‐Weisse E, Thomas‐Cancian A, et al. Bone mar­
               signal changes during time in equine limbs refrigerated at 4   row lesions of the distal condyles of the third metacarpal bone are
               degrees C. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:19–24.    common and not always related to lameness in sports and pleas­
            22.  Bolen GE, Haye D, Dondelinger RF, et al. Impact of successive   ure horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2019;60:167–175.
               freezing‐thawing cycles on 3‐T magnetic resonance images of the   44.  Dyson, S. Proximal metacarpal and metatarsal pain: a diagnostic
               digits of isolated equine limbs. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:780–790.  challenge. Equine Vet Educ 2003;15:134–138.
            23.  Bolt DM, Read RM, Weller R, et al. Standing low‐field magnetic   45.  Dyson S. The distal tarsal region. In Equine MRI. Murray RC
               resonance imaging of a comminuted central tarsal bone fracture   Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2011;405–419.
               in a horse. Equine Vet Educ 2013;25:618–623.    46.  Dyson S, Murray R. Collateral desmitis of the distal interphalan­
            24.  Boswell JC, Schramme MC, Murray RM, et al. Low or high‐field   geal joint in 62 horses (January 2001–December 2003). Proc Am
               MRI  in  equine  lameness  diagnosis.  Proc  Eur  Coll  Vet  Surg,   Assoc Equine Pract 2004;50:248–256.
               2005;14:189–194.                                47.  Dyson SJ, Murray R. Osseous trauma in the fetlock region of mature
            25.  Branch MV, Murray RC, Dyson SJ, et al. Alteration of distal tarsal   sports horses. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2006;52:443–456.
               subchondral bone thickness pattern in horses with tarsal pain.   48.  Dyson SJ, Murray RM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine
               Equine Vet J 2005;37:450–455.                      fetlock. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2007;6:62–77.
            26.  Branch M, Murray RC, Dyson SJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imag­  49.  Dyson SJ, Murray RC. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of
               ing of the equine tarsus. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2007;6:96–102.  264 horses with foot pain: the podotrochlear apparatus, deep
            27.  Branch MV, Murray RC, Dyson SJ, Goodship AE. Is there a char­  digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal inter­
               acteristic distal tarsal subchondral bone plate thickness pattern in   phalangeal joint. Equine Vet J 2007;39:340–343.
               horses with no history of hindlimb lameness? Equine  Vet J   50.  Dyson S, Murray R. Injuries associated with ossification of the
               2007;39:101–105.                                   cartilage  of  the  foot.  Proc  Am  Assoc  Equine  Pract  2010;
            28.  Brokken MT, Schneider RK, Sampson SN, et al. Magnetic reso­  56:152–165.
               nance imaging features of proximal metacarpal and metatarsal   51.  Dyson S, Nagy A. Injuries associated with the cartilages of the
               injuries in the horse. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:507–517.  foot. Equine Vet Educ 2011;23:581–593.
            29.  Brokken M, Tucker R and Murray M. The metacarpal/metatarsal   52.  Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M, et al. Lameness in 46 horses
               region. In Equine MRI. R.C. Murray, ed. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford,   associated with deep digital flexor tendonitis in the digit: diagno­
               UK, 2011;361–383.                                  sis confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging. Equine  Vet J
            30.  Brünisholz HP, Hagen R, Fürst AE, Kuemmerle JM. Radiographic   2003;35:681–690.
               and computed tomographic configuration of incomplete proximal   53.  Dyson SJ, Murray RC, Schramme M, et al. Collateral desmitis of
               fractures of the proximal phalanx in horses not used for racing.   the distal interphalangeal joint in 18 horses (2001–2002). Equine
               Vet Surg 2015;44:809–815.                          Vet J 2004;36:160–166.
            31.  Busoni V, Snaps F. Effect of deep digital flexor tendon orientation on   54.  Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M. Lameness associated with foot
               magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity in isolated equine limbs—  pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses
               the magic angle effect. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:428–430.  (January 2001–December 2003) and response to treatment.
            32.  Busoni V, Heimann M, Trenteseaux J, et al. Magnetic resonance   Equine Vet J 2005;37:113–121.
               imaging findings in the equine deep digital flexor tendon and dis­  55.  Dyson SJ, Blunden T, Murray RM, Schramme MC. Current con­
               tal sesamoid bone in advanced navicular disease‐an ex vivo study.   cepts of navicular disease. Equine Vet Educ 2010;23:27–29.
               Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:279–286.          56.  Dyson S, Brown V, Collins S, Murray R. Is there an association
            33.  Carstens  A, Kirberger RM, Dahlberg LE, et  al.  Validation of   between ossification of the cartilages of the foot and collateral
               delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of car­  desmopathy of the distal interphalangeal joint or distal phalanx
               tilage and T2 mapping for quantifying distal metacarpus/metatar­  injury? Equine Vet J 2010;42:504–511.
               sus cartilage thickness  in Thoroughbred racehorses. Vet Radiol   57.  Dyson S, Pool R, Blunden T, Murray R. The distal sesamoidean
               Ultrasound 2013;54:139–148.                        impar ligament: comparison between its appearance on magnetic
   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465