Page 49 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 49

17


  VetBooks.ir






               3

               Using Data for Clinical Decision Making

               Philip H. Kass, DVM, MPVM, MS, PhD

               Department of Population Health  and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA


               The advent of the electronic medical record was accom-  a  typically  brief  period  of  time  to  obtain  an  adequate
               panied by a new‐found feasibility for veterinary medical   total sample size, which are called “cross‐sectional stud-
               practitioners, either at individual hospitals or through   ies.” The second involves those with data on groups of
               multiinstitutional collaborations, to gather, analyze,   patients with some defining inclusion criteria collected
               interpret, and publish their clinical data. While it is still   over a specified period of time, allowing measurement of
               common to read individual case or case series reports in   a temporal change in patient characteristics and health
               medical journals, electronic data and searchable data-  status, which are called “longitudinal” studies. The latter
               bases extend the ability of veterinarians to design more   can be further subdivided into those that are interven-
               sophisticated studies that go beyond the bounds of being   tional (the clinical analog of experimental), where the
               purely descriptive. Such design enhancements allow the   investigators have control over the treatment(s) of pri-
               measurement of differences and associations between   mary interest the patients receive, and observational
               two or more factors of interest, and in some cases lead to   (nonexperimental), where the investigators can passively
               estimation of measures of effect that under assumptions   or actively record, but not manipulate, the treatment(s)
               of unbiasedness can lead to causal inferences.     of primary interest. The focus here on treatments arises
                 Using clinically derived data to make informed medi-  from the nature of clinical research: any treatment in a
               cal decisions is a central tenet underlying the practice of   clinical setting should be pursuant to the best interests of
               evidence‐based medicine, an evolving form of scientific   the patient and owner, and should not be any lesser qual-
               scholarship that seeks to bring objectivity and elucida-  ity of treatment than the accepted standard of care in
               tion to the implementation of medical investigation, and   veterinary medical practice.
               that exists at the confluence of medicine, basic sciences,   As noted, analyses of treatments are not restricted to
               applied  mathematics/biostatistics,  epidemiology,  and   interventional  longitudinal  studies, although  it will  be
               causal inference. Using data analytically is only one   shown that observational longitudinal studies of treat-
               component of evidence‐based medicine, and cannot be   ment effects are prone to potentially severe biases.
               dissociated from equally important others. While col-  Longitudinal studies also need not be restricted to study-
               laboration is all but essential in ensuring that these   ing treatment effects: intrinsic characteristics of patients,
               respective component specialties are well represented,   and how those may be associated with clinical sequelae,
               of most proximate importance to veterinarians seeking   may instead be a primary objective of a researcher.
               to advance beyond the hypothesis phase of their clinical
               research is a fundamental understanding of hospital‐
               based epidemiologic study design, for this is the study     Hospital‐Based Cross‐sectional Studies
               type that determines the data collected, and in turn how
               it should be analyzed and interpreted [1].         Cross‐sectional studies are conducted when a clinician
                 The most common study designs employed in clinical   wants to establish an inventory of disease burden,
               veterinary research will  be  considered  in subsequent   patient characteristics, and exposure to factors in a pop-
               sections of this chapter. These will be broadly partitioned   ulation. A shelter veterinarian, for example, may be
               into two temporal types. The first involves data measure-  interested in knowing the crude proportion of a shelter
               ments taken on an assemblage of patients all present at a   population at any defined time point that has clinical
               point in time, or on a succession of patients enrolled over   signs of upper respiratory disease. This proportion is

               Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine Volume I, First Edition. Edited by David S. Bruyette.
               © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
               Companion website: www.wiley.com/go/bruyette/clinical
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54