Page 69 - Stakis Consolidated Teaching Note
P. 69

Essentially, Stakis, under Andros was embarking on a

                 programme of expansion funded by borrowings and the

                 hope of increased profit generation from new ventures.
                 This was just at a time when the economy was moving into

                 recession and interest rates were taking off.




                 The result was inevitable, as gearing climbed revenues fell

                 and Stakis moved ever deeper into trouble.




                 Period (b)




                 One of the first questions to answer here is "What is

                 meant by the term trouble"? In essence it could mean

                 going bankrupt. Technically a company has to declare itself

                 insolvent (and therefore cease trading) if it cannot pay its
                 debts as they fall due, and the directors are guilty of

                 wrongful trading if they incur liabilities that they know

                 there is little or no prospect of paying. This is where the

                 banks come into the picture. Default on interest payment
                 would give the banks the right immediately to sue for

                 repayment of all debt which at the time was rapidly

                 moving towards £230 million. Sir Reo and his family
                 owned some 23% of the shares in Stakis. The result of the

                 family’s purchase of  an additional 4 million shares at

                 130p per share taking his shareholding to 27% meant

                 that when the share price fell to its low of 19p the share
                 value of Sir Reo’s holding suffered a massive loss with the
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74