Page 216 - Six Sigma Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts
P. 216

August 31, 2006
                         2:58
                               Char Count= 0
 JWBK119-13
                                                                             201
                                 Confidence Limits For C pk



                                                  (C , k, p)
                                                    p


               k


                                  (C , k, p)
                                    p





                                            C p

           Figure 13.5 Tolerance box for computing upper and lower confidence limits of k.


        Projecting horizontally across at the points from C to C p intersecting the contour
                                                     p
                                                       ¯
      of p, we will arrive at the estimated values of kand k. From Figure 13.4 the esti-
      mated k then corresponds to C and k corresponds to C p . As shown in Figure 13.5, a
                                 p
      rectangular box can also be drawn with (C p , p, k) and (C , p, k) at the two opposite
                                                         p
      extreme corners. Hence the solution to equations (13.10) and (13.11) would simply
      imply locating the two corners of the postulated box.



                        13.4 CONFIDENCE LIMITS FOR C pk

      The index
              min (USL − μ, μ − LSL)
        C pk =                                                            (13.12)
                       3σ
      gives the scaled distance between the process mean (μ) and the closest specification
      limit. C pk can also be written in terms of k as

        C pk = (1 − k) C p .                                              (13.13)
        Having established the confidence limits for k, we propose three approximate two-
      sided confidence limits for C pk by assuming that:

      (a) variability in C p dominates, while that of k is not significant;
      (b) variability in k dominates, while that of C p is not significant;
      (c) variability in both k and C p is significant.
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221