Page 315 - Six Sigma Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts
P. 315

OTE/SPH
 OTE/SPH
          August 31, 2006
                              Char Count= 0
 JWBK119-19
        300              3:6 Economical Experimentation via ‘Lean Design’
        Table 19.1 Some lean design possibilities for a regular eight-run design.
                     Total no. of                                       Reduction in
        No. of   necessary main and   Smallest lean   Reduction in no.  experimental
        factors   interaction effects  design available   of runs.      resources (%)

        3                4                L 5 2 3           3              37.5
                         5                L 6 2 3           2              25.0
                         6                L 7 2 3           1              12.5
                         7                L 8 2 3           0                --
        4                4               L 5 2 4−1          3              37.5
                         5               L 6 2 4−1          2              25.0
                         6               L 7 2 4−1          1              12.5
                         7               L 8 2 4−1          0                --
        5                4               L 5 2 5−2          3              37.5
                         5               L 6 2 5−2          2              25.0
                         6               L 7 2 5−2          1              12.5
                         7               L 8 2 5−2          0                --
        6                4               L 5 2 6−3          3              37.5
                         5               L 6 2 6−3          2              25.0
                         6               L 7 2 6−3          1              12.5
                         7               L 8 2 6−3          0                --
        7                4               L 5 2 7−4          3              37.5
                         5               L 6 2 7−4          2              25.0
                         6               L 7 2 7−4          1              12.5
                         7               L 8 2 7−4          0                --



        effort (37.5%, 25.0% and 12.5%, respectively) can be realized. Note that all the eight-
        run lean designs, that is, L 8 2 k−p , are no different from regular 2 k−p  designs, and do
        not lead to any experimental data reduction.
          Generally, the savings in experimental effort can be deduced as follows. Given a

        regular design of 2 k−p  runs, n main and interaction effects may be asked for:
          n < n ≤ 2 k−p .                                                    (19.1)

        The maximum reduction in number of observations in a lean design L n 2 k−p  is then

          n r = 2 k−p  − n − 1.                                              (19.2)
          An illustration of calculations in a lean design experiment is now in order. Suppose
        in a fractional factorial experiment for five factors, each response takes about a week
        to obtain, and the project manager considers 8 weeks too long for the investigation.
        A lean design of type L 6 2 5−2  can be used to cut data collection time by a fortnight,
        supported by the technical judgment that interaction effects in this experiment are
        negligible.
          In this situation, a standard 2 5−2  design matrix can be first constructed based on
        part of the 2 7−4  matrix shown in Table 19.2. Suppose columns x 6 and x 7 are not used
        in the experimental design. One can opt to omit two of the eight experimental runs i,
        i = 1, 2, . . . , 8, as only six degrees of freedom are needed to calculate E 0 and five main
   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320