Page 41 - Complexity Perspective_Neat

Disruption is the term used today to describe the turbulence created
by the current flowering of digital technology. It is, however, worth
remembering that Disruption is an inevitable and inherent
characteristic of an emergent context. It occurs at all levels of
integration (e.g., the French Revolution) and will happen forever.

Academic Manifestation of Ashby's Law

The above discussion is rooted in complexity thinking. But, Ashby's
Law is also the (unstated) underpinning of the work of academics in
sociology and has been explored for decades under the name
Institutional Theory. (Scott (1995)
In Institutional Theory, the ideas, norms of behavior, laws &
regulations, patterns of organization that are widely accepted are
termed Institutions. They are seen as providing a stabilizing
framework for social and business life. They are 'the way things are
done'. Often, this bundle of behaviors and accepted norms is termed
'culture'. (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983; Meyer and Rowan, 1977).

Institutional Isomorphism

Every firm sits inside a context. Every firm must share characteristics
with its context and adapt to changes if it is to survive. The process of
conforming to these accepted patterns is called in academia
Institutional Isomorphism.
This has huge implications for the degrees of strategic freedom any
organization can wield.

Every context has structures, assumptions, and regulations that,
broadly speaking, no individual firm is able to influence (though they
can try through lobbying, political corruption, and active invention).
Most firms do not try but (un)consciously adopt the demands of the
context.
Three modes of adoption have been identified:

● Coercive: E.g., the requirements of the Law or the political
pressures and regulations that surround the firm

● Normative: E.g., the professional requirements accepted
employees and the norms of behavior demanded or permitted by

41
©Business Games Works 2018 (V1 Beta)