Page 63 - Albanian law on entrepreuners and companies - text with with commentary
P. 63

c) in the case under letter c) of paragraph 1 of this Article, up to a value equal to
            the total amount of outstanding company obligations incurred after the moment he/she
            know or must have known of the situation described in letter c) of paragraph 1 of this
            Article;
                 (3)  In  case  one  or  more  of  the  above  violations  have  been  jointly  committed  by
            more  than  one  of  the  persons  listed  in  paragraph  1,  than  persons  committing  the
            violations shall be jointly and severally liable towards the third parties, including public
            authorities.
                 (4) Persons mentioned in paragraph 1 shall be personally liable under this Article
            towards  third  parties,  including  public  authorities,  only  if  their  actions  as  described
            herein, has been ascertained by final court decision.
                 (5)  Person  mentioned  in  paragraph  1,  shall  not  be  personally  liable  under  this
            Article towards third parties, who, when the company became committed to them, were
            aware of these infringements, or could not in view of evident circumstances have been
            unaware of them.
                 (6) Any claim against persons mentioned in paragraph 1 must be brought within 3
                                             90
            years from committing the infringement.”

            Comments:

            1.   The separation of a company’s legal personality from the personality of its members is a
            legal  concept  provided  for  in  the  law  that  aims  at  promoting  business  investment.  By
            separating  a  company’s  legal  personality  from  that  of  its  members  the  law  also  limits  the
            liability risk that  the members of a limited liability or joint-stock company  may have as a
            result  of  an  unprofitable  investment,  since  it  provides  that  their  personal  liability  for  their
            company’s obligations extends up to the unpaid part of subscribed contributions.
                 The  limitation  of  members’  personal  liability  is  not  a  fundamental  right  but  rather a
            privilege  recognized  by  the  Law.  Based  on  the  above,  company  members  enjoying  the
            privilege of limited liability therefore have to use it for lawful purposes and not abuse it in
            unfair way.
                 On the basis of this principle, Article 16 of Law No. 9901 contains one of the novelties
            that the Company Law of 2008 introduced. Article 16 introduced the principle of piercing the
            corporate veil principle in the Albanian legislation, a principle which was initially developed
                          91
                                            92
            by the US case law  and further in Europe.
                 According  to  this  principle,  if  the  persons  enjoying  the  privilege  of  limited  liability
            provided by a company use it for unlawful purposes or abuse it in way that is detrimental to


            90  Amended by law No. 129/2014, Article 5.
            91  See Peter B. Oh, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Veil-Piercing; http://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php? pdf;
            92  See the collection of the jurisprudence of the Federal Court (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH) in civil law rulings, volume
            151 (2002), p. 181 et seq. (BGHZ 151, 181 et seq.). For UK, see case Jones v. Lipman [1962] 1 All ER 442;
                                                                              62
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68