Page 65 - Albanian law on entrepreuners and companies - text with with commentary
P. 65

example  to  shift  losses  and  create  the  image  of  ‘solvency.’  Shareholders  and  managers
            responsible for the creation of such companies may be directly liable. Another set of cases
            regards  company  assets  used  by  managers  as  their  own  assets;  finally  cases  of  extreme
            (fraudulent) undercapitalization.

            3.   As  these  examples  show,  piercing-the-veil  standards  have  been  developed  by
            jurisprudence in the various legal systems (US, UK, Germany, etc.) in order to cover a ‘gap’
            not  otherwise  covered  by  special  liability  provisions.  This  jurisprudence  agrees  that  legal
            personality and limited liability should not be set aside easily. Where existing provisions can
            cover such abusive action, the general clause of ‘abuse of legal form’ is not necessary. The
            new Company Law is, on the one hand, well equipped with provisions regarding duties and
            liabilities  of  managers  and  (majority)  members/shareholders  towards  (other)  members/
            shareholders  and  creditors.  The  new  Law  protects  members/shareholders  and  creditors  by
            fiduciary duties of members and managers (Article 14); by the special fiduciary duties and
            liability  standards of  Articles  98  and 163, in particular  against  trading  in  spite of  pending
            insolvency (paragraphs (4) of Article 98 and 163); by claims for annulment of decisions in
            case of serious breach of law or statute (Articles 91 and 151); and, last but definitely not least,
            by the new law of groups provisions in Article 206 to 212 which aim at the liability of parents
            towards subsidiaries and their shareholders and creditors.

            4.   Albanian Civil and Company Law even has a basic rule against ‘undercapitalization’. It
            can be found in the second sentence of Article 1076 Civil Code on simple partnerships: the
            contribution must “reach an amount necessary for achieving the partnership’s objective”. We
            think that the final part of the sentence “unless otherwise provided by the contract” only refers
            to  the  quota  of  contribution  which  can  be  other  than  equal,  not  to  the  sufficiency  of  the
            amount,  as  this  particular  part  of  the  provision  would  otherwise  not  make  sense.  In  other
            words,  the  rule  to  contribute  sufficient  capital  to  make  the  company  work  can  only  be
            mandatory. Due to the basic function that Civil Code rules on simple partnerships have for the
            Company Law, this basic rule also applies to the companies of the new Company Law. The
            rule  highlights  the  fiduciary  duty  of  founders,  but  also  of  future  managing  partners  and
            members  and  of  (managing)  directors  not  to  send  a  company  on  the  market  unless  it
            possesses sufficient financial resources to run its particular business and to be able to pay its
            creditors. However, the application of this basic rule must always take the specific capital
                                                                 94
            maintenance model of the company and its actual situation into account.  The requirement of
            adequate capital is quite separate from the formal requirement of registration of an LLC with
            only  a  capital  of  100  Lekë.  This  makes  sure  that  the  company  can  be  formed  with  the
            minimum of bureaucracy. When the company actually commences its operations those taking
            part  must  ensure  that  it  has  enough  money  to  be  able  to  pay  its  debts  as  they  fall  due.
            Otherwise it will be in a position of insolvency and there will be liability both under the Civil
            Code  Rules  and  under  paragraphs  (4)  of  Article  98  and  163  of  the  Company  Law.  With

            94  Bachner, Schuster and Winner, “Critique of the Legal Capital Concept” in The New Albanian Company Law, 2009, p.
            63.
                                                                              64
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70