Page 262 - Data Science Algorithms in a Week
P. 262

244          Khaled Alshareef, Ahmad Rahal and Mohammed Basingab

                       hospital. The hospital operates three eight-hour shifts (day, evening, and night sifts), with
                       additional  resources  allocated  when  crowded  (from  10  am  to  9  pm).  ED  process
                       flowchart is shown in Figure 8.











                       Figure 8. The process chart of the ED (Duguay & Chetouane, 2007).



                       Case Retrieve

                          The target set of G = {Optimization, Path 1, 5, 11, 1, 0} describes the attributes of the
                       new case and reads as follow: 1) the objective of the study is optimization, 2) using Path
                       1, 3) with five doctors (physicians), 4) eleven nurses, 5) one lab technician, and 6) no
                       other staff for administrative purposes. Upon defining the target set, the retrieval code
                       searched  the  case-base  for  similarities  to  the  case  at  hand  using  the  two  previously
                       described  approaches.  Cases  2,  4,  and  1  were  sequentially  retrieved  using  nearest
                       approach with a K value of three (K = 3 due to the limited number of cases in the base-
                       case), while case 2 was retrieved using the induction tree approach, concluding that case
                       2 has the closest similarity to the new case.


                       Case Reuse


                          Choosing SIMIO as a modeling environment, a DES model for the problem at hand
                       was developed using the attributes of each of the previously described entities (patients,
                       Medical  and  non-medical  staff),  the  working  schedule,  and  the  likely  paths  taken  by
                       customers during their ED visit.
                          The simulation model ran under multiple scenarios and under multiple circumstances
                       with results revealing patients classified as code 3 had acceptable average waiting time in
                       the system of about 1.86 hours, while patients coded as 4 and 5 averaged a waiting time
                       of 11.86 and 5.86 hours respectively. Furthermore, the results show the utilization rate of
                       doctors and  nurses’  running  at  99%,  with the first  assessment station’s  utilization  rate
                       running almost at full capacity (see Figure 9, Table 4 & Table 5).
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267