Page 18 - BANKING FINANCE OCTOBER 2021
P. 18

LEGAL UPDATE










                                       Leg
                                       Legal Cal Caasesess
                                       Leg          al C           a   se      s
                                       Legal Cases
                                       Legal Cases









         Employee can challenge             job itself," said a bench of justices U U  Now, in another case, Hemraj
                                            Lalit and Ajay Rastogi.            Ratnakar Salian Vs HDFC Bank, it ap-
         terms of service in some
                                            It said that submissions of the    pears that the borrowers tried to pre-
         cases, says SC                     university's counsel that the petition-  vent the bank from taking possession
         An employer is always in a "dominat-  ers had accepted the terms and con-  of a building by bringing in a 'tenant'
         ing position" but it is open for the  ditions contained in the letter of ap-  (Hemraj Ratnakar). It did not work out
         employee to challenge the terms and  pointment deserves rejection for the  for them.
         conditions of service if it is not in con-  reason that it is "not open" for a per-  Supreme Court judges, S Abdul Nazeer
         formity with the statutory require-  son appointed in public employment to
         ment under the law, the Supreme    ordinary choose the terms and condi-  and Krishna Murari, have viewed
         Court said.                        tions of which he is required to serve.  Ratnakar's claim with suspicion, noting
                                                                               that "there is a serious doubt as to the
         The top court made the remarks in its                                 bona fide of the tenant, as there is no
         judgment while setting aside the Au- Rights of tenant cannot be
         gust 2013 verdict of the Uttarakhand  compromised           under     good or sufficient evidence to establish
         High Court which had dismissed the                                    the tenancy."
         plea filed by teachers of department of SARFAESI Act proceedings      In any case, the ploy tripped over a
         pharmaceutical sciences of a university  If a bank has lent against the security  point of law. The Supreme Court said,
         questioning the process of holding  of a building, and if the loan becomes  citing previous judgments, if a tenant
         open selection pursuant to an August  an NPA, then the bank can take pos-  claims entitlement to the possession of
         2011 advertisement and also the al-  session of the building under the  a property for over a year, his claim has
         leged arbitrary conditions incorpo-  SARFAESI Act. However, there is a big  to be supported by the execution of a
         rated in their appointment order.  'but'.                             registered instrument. If there is none,
         "It goes without saying that employer  But if the building is occupied by a ten-  and the tenant relies on an unregis-
         is always in a dominating position and  ant who has been paying rent, the  tered instrument or an oral agree-
         it is open to the employer to dictate  tenancy cannot be disturbed by the  ment - sorry!
         the terms of employment. The em-   bank, by taking possession of the build-
         ployee who is at the receiving end can  ing. In the case of Bajrang   In the Hemraj Ratnakar Vs HDFC Bank
                                                                               case, all that the 'tenant' could pro-
         hardly complain of arbitrariness in the  Shyamsunder Agarwal Vs Central Bank
                                                                               duce was some xerox copies of rent
         terms and conditions of employment.  of India, a 3-member bench of the Su-
         This court can take judicial notice of the  preme Court had held that "the rights  receipts. Also, the borrowers never
         fact that if an employee takes initiation  of a rightful tenant cannot be compro-  claimed there was a tenant. "There-
         in questioning the terms and conditions  mised under the SARFAESI Act pro-  fore, he is not entitled to any protec-
         of employment, that would cost his/her  ceedings."                    tion of the rent," the verdict said. T

            18 | 2021 | OCTOBER                                                            | BANKING FINANCE
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23