Page 475 - The Social Animal
P. 475

Chapter 4 457


        96. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
            32, 311–329.
        97. Langer, E. J. (1977). The psychology of chance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behav-
            ior, 7, 185–208.
        98. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V.H., & Savitsky, K. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judg-
            ment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appear-
            ance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 211–222.

        99. Glick, P., Gottesman, D., & Jolton, J. (1989). The fault is not in the stars: Susceptibil-
            ity of skeptics and believers in astrology to the Barnum effect. Personality and Social Psy-
            chology Bulletin, 15(4), 572–583.
        100. Petty, R. E., & Brock, T. C. (1979). Effects of “Barnum” personality assessments on
            cognitive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 201–203.
        101. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal
            of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.
              Breckler, S. J., Pratkanis, A. R., & McCann, D. (1991). The representation of self in
            multidimensional cognitive space. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 97–112.
              Brenner, M. (1973).The next-in-line effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Be-
            havior, 12, 320–323.
              Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1992).The generation effect: Delineation of a phenom-
            enon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.
              Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the en-
            coding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35,
            677–688.
              Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self-referent encoding: The contri-
            butions of elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social
            Psychology, 55, 5–11.
        102. San Francisco Sunday Examiner and Chronicle, April 22, 1979, p. 35.

        103. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving attributional
            bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 56–67.
              Arkin, R. M., & Maruyama, G. M. (1979). Attribution, affect, and college exam
            performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 85–93.
              Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Per-
            sonality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110–1126.
              Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Jour-
            nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–336.
              Breckler, S. J., Pratkanis, A. R., & McCann, D. (1991). The representation of self in
            multidimensional cognitive space. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 97–112.
              Johnston, W. A. (1967). Individual performance and self-evaluation in a simulated
            team. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 309–328.
              Cunningham, J. D., Starr, P. A., & Kanouse, D. E. (1979). Self as actor, active ob-
            server, and passive observer: Implications for causal attribution. Journal of Personality
            and Social Psychology, 37, 1146–1152.
        104. Greenwald, A. G., & Breckler, S. J. (1985). To whom is the self presented? In
            B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 126–145). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480