Page 474 - The Social Animal
P. 474

456 The Social Animal


              Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized
            test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of
            Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662.
              Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelli-
            gence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an
            intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
        84. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the at-
            tribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.
            10, pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press.

        85. Bierbrauer, G. (1973). Effect of set, perspective, and temporal factors in attribution. Un-
            published Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University as described in Ross (1977).
        86. Ross, L., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and bi-
            ases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35,
            485–494.

        87. Answers: Forbes field in Pittsburgh, Vilnius, and July 4, 1826.
        88. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent precep-
            tions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley,
            R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behav-
            ior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
              See also: Jones, E. E., Rock, L., Shaver, K. G., Goethals, G. R., & Ward, L. M.
            (1968). Pattern of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect.
            Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 317–349; McArthur, L. (1972). The how
            and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of
            Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171–193; Nisbett, R. E., Caputo, C., Legant, P., &
            Marecek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of
            Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164.
        89. Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing the perspective
            of actors and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165–175.

        90. Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial be-
            havior. Child Development, 67(2), 449–470.
        91. James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology (pp. 314–315). New York: Dover.
        92. Greenwald, A. G. (1980).The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal his-
            tory. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.
              Greenwald, A. G., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1984). The self. In R. S. Wyer &
            T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 129–178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erl-
            baum.
        93. Greenwald, A. G. (1980).The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal his-
            tory. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.

        94. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ:
            Princeton University Press.
        95. Maura Reynolds. The Los Angeles Times, Jan. 3, 2003.
   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479