Page 473 - The Social Animal

Chapter 4 455

Fischhoff, B. (1977). Perceived informativeness of facts. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 349–358.
73. Greenwald, A. G. (1980).The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal his-
tory. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.
74. LaPiere, R. (1934). Attitudes versus actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.
75. Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt
behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 41–78.
76. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions:The attribution process
in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology
(Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.
77. Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimen-
tal Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.
78. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino &
E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 204–242). New York:
Guilford Press.
Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of atti-
tude accessibility. In A.R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude
structure and function (pp. 153–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the
attitude–perception and attitude–behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984
presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514.
See also: Bassili, J. N. (1995). On the psychological reality of party identification: Ev-
idence from the accessibility of voting intentions and of partisan feelings. Political Be-
havior, 17, 39–358.
80. Fazio, R. H., Chen, J., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibil-
ity, attitude–behavior consistency, and the strength of the object–evaluation association.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 339–357.
Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Herr, P. M. (1983). Toward a process model of atti-
tude–behavior relation: Accessing one’s attitude upon mere observation of the attitude
object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723–735.
Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude–behavior con-
sistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp.
162–202). New York: Academic Press.
Regan, D. T., & Fazio, R. H. (1977). On the consistency between attitudes and be-
havior: Look to the method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psy-
chology, 13, 38–45.
81. Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106–1115.
82. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development.
Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
83. Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on
African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Exper-
imental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.