Page 317 - Deception at work all chapters EBook
P. 317

370 An HR Guide to Workplace Fraud and Criminal Behaviour

To achieve these objectives, it is essential that the anxiety of the guilty party is increased so
that he reveals himself and there are three ways of doing this.

METHOD 1: ELIMINATION CHECKLIST

Background and planning

You should obtain as much information as possible about the problem in question, and about
any similar incidents, develop a fraud theory and prepare single-sheet summaries of any ‘key
points’ which can be shown to the subjects at the appropriate time. You should also get as much
background as possible on each of the potential suspects along the lines of Appendix 1.

Preparing the checklist

Prepare a checklist on the lines of Table 9.6 below, tailored to the facts of the case con-
cerned.19

    Reformat the table on to sheets of A4 paper and prepare a clean copy for each interview.

Table 9.6 Potential elimination questions and profiled answers

No. Nature of question or statement Indicative reaction

                                     Indicative of responsibility  Indicative of innocence
                                     Little detail                 Detailed
                                     Lack of commitment            Committed
                                     No volunteered                Volunteered information
                                     information

12                                   34

1 The opening statement              Anxious                       Interested
                                     Defensive body language       Open body language
                                     Appears threatened            Relaxed

Do you know why I have asked to      Will usually prevaricate and Will usually know; he
see you?
                                     say ‘no’                      admits there is a problem

Is there anything you want to ask    Unlikely to ask a question or Asks a sensible question
me?                                  asks one which is irrelevant

2 Did you do it?                     Prevarication                 A committed ‘no’

                                     Not a clear binary answer

3 Have you discussed this case with Prevarication                  A committed ‘yes’ or ‘no’
        your colleagues?

4 Have you had any contact           Prevarication                 A committed ‘yes’ or ‘no’

with [names of people already

interviewed] since I spoke to them?

5 If so, what did they say?          Prevarication                 Likely to provide detail
                                     Unlikely to give detail

6 Do you think the [actual losses] are Prevarication or may        May ask for clarification

deliberate and premeditated theft? minimize the seriousness of or a committed ‘yes’

                                     the case

19 The checklist should jump from topic to topic as shown
   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322