Page 49 - Carbon Frauds and Corruption

Corruption of Bribery

Chapter 6 : Corruption in the “Carbon World”

7.4.2 Rigging of the Peer Review Process
A supposed condition for any paper being considered for “assessment” by the IPCC is that it was
peer reviewed and published. The “whistle blower” emails leaked from the UEA (see page xx)
show that the closed group of believing scientists deliberately subverted the peer review process
to suppress dissent. In one email Professor Philip Jones refers to two contrarian papers
submitted by Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick as follows:

"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow‐even if
we have to redefine what peer‐reviewed literature is!"

He also e‐mailed Michael Mann stating:

"I recently rejected two papers ……. from people saying CRU has it wrong over Siberia. Went to town on both
reviews, hopefully successfully. If either appears I'll be very surprised"

The net effect of such blatant manipulation is that even the best academic papers are not
considered by the IPCC if they hint of the slightest contrarian view.

7.4.3 Spinning the Commentariat
There have been more than credible allegations that Wikipedia entries on “global warming” have
been repeatedly massaged by believers, again to suppress contrarian views and that blogs and
websites have been altered with the same objectives. It is easy to become fixated by a “noble
cause”. In hundreds of seminars and conferences on “global warming” there is not a single
session on fraud and corruption, audit, control or security (see “What you don’t know can’t hurt
you” page xx)

7.4.4 Dodgy Dossiers
The “Carbon World” is packed with “Dodgy Dossiers”, ranging from the IPCC assessments
48
through to the Stern Report , Albert Arnold Gore, Jr’s film and books, investment and other
prospectus, not to mention repeatedly misleading and inaccurate accounting. The obvious
question is why all this chicanery is necessary if the science is so solid. You don’t need to be a
weatherman to find the answer.

7.4.5 Extortion to Comply
Finally, companies are being beaten into submission to support the “noble cause”. Any company
that cannot prove its green credentials (by such things as support for the Carbon Disclosure
Project) has little chance of winning EU or UK Government contracts. The dice are well and truly
loaded.

48 By Lord Stern on the economic impact of UK emissions mitigation

C:\Cobasco\NEW BOOK ON BRIBERY AND CARBON\For Cobasco Web Site Remove Chapters\Chapter 6 Corruption in 31
the Carbon World for Gower.docx | THE CULTURE OF THE CARBON WORLD