Page 50 - Carbon Frauds and Corruption
P. 50

Corruption of Bribery

                                      Chapter 6 : Corruption in the “Carbon World”


               7.5   Decision Perversion
               Another widespread  impact of the “noble cause” is on commercial decision making. Compliance
               with the environmental “silo” may be used to justify decisions that, in reality, have been
               perverted by corruption.

               Already such a trend can be seen where non‐governmental, quasi‐ governmental and private organisations have
               taken it upon themselves to evaluate and rank companies, such as super‐markets on their carbon compliance. The
               objective is to drive consumers towards the acquiescent retailer, irrespective of “value for money”. The problem is
               that these advisory, charitable or altruistic  organisations are not regulated in any way: are exposed to glaring
               conflicts of interest and corruption and are unaccountable for their actions.

               Even more schemes will appear offering a carbon rating or product labelling such as  “Energy Stars”, supposedly
               to direct consumers to the most eco‐friendly goods and services. The question arises over the validity of such
               markings; how they are verified and who verifies them. The potential for dishonest suppliers to inflate claims – at
               a cost to their apparently less green competitors – is serious. So is corruption within the rating organisations
               themselves.

               The bottom line is that the  “noble cause” creates artificial needs, of questionable value, whose
               outputs are virtually impossible to measure, that inevitably result in massive expenditure. The
               cause empowers mid‐level civil servants, commercial inspection companies, rating agencies,
               busybodies  and scammers to take decisions and impose conditions that have enormous
               commercial and social impacts: usually without any personal accountability.

                                   49
               The Energy Saving Trust  claimed that if everyone buying a new desktop computer in 2010 chose one it had rated
               as "energy efficient"  they could save £28 million off their energy bills a year, and over 60,000 tonnes of carbon
               dioxide emissions. The Trust helpfully pointed out that 60,000 tonnes of CO2 is enough to fill 340,000 double‐
               decker buses each year!  Isn’t that an interesting metric: at least it is not a percentage.

               The only computers rated were made by “VeryPC” a brand that most people have never heard of except for the
               appearance of its boss on the TV program “Dragon’s Den” He wanted £250,000 for a 5% stake in his company but
               Peter Jones (one of the Dragons)  attacked the company's power consumption calculations, accusing the boss of
               overseeing "a pretty averagely crap business", while fellow Dragon Duncan Bannatyne claimed: "I've never heard
               such rubbish in my life”. Yet, VeryPC is still the only approved "energy efficient" supplier.

               PRINCIPLE
               The "noble cause" can result in perversion of procurement decisions


               7.6   Unintended Consequences
               Many mitigation and abatement measures have serious unintended consequences that are
               brushed aside in pursuit of the “noble cause”. They include:





                   49  You guessed it: funded by the British Government



               C:\Cobasco\NEW BOOK ON BRIBERY AND CARBON\For Cobasco Web Site Remove Chapters\Chapter 6 Corruption in   32
               the Carbon World for Gower.docx                                 | THE CULTURE OF THE CARBON WORLD
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55