Page 107 - Bundle for MF Final
P. 107

Bates no   106





                6. EARLIER MISREPRESENTATIONS
                Mr Solheim had been less than honest in many of his communications with Kingsley Napley,
                MJC and his insurers. Text highlighted in red indicates a probable misrepresentation.
                Schedule: Repeated between January 2017 to February 2018:
                The following statement was repeated on various documents, leading to the final claim
                schedule;



                       "For the avoidance of doubt and in the spirit of openness, the claimant has received
                       insurance payments.  Lump sum payments had been made for the loss of his licence,
                       but on the policies for which he himself paid.  These are therefore irrelevant to the
                       claim.  He has also received income replacement insurance that the policy required
                       him to make a subrogated claim on behalf of the insurer.  The claimant is therefore for
                       its full loss."

                       Complex and policies and claims have not been produced.


                        Premiums paid by        Loss of licence    Personal accident   Income replacement

                        Paid by himself           1  Hiscox              2               3 Cirencester
                                                  Declared          None known             Declared
                                              False application?     But possible      Subrogation rights
                                             Possibly duplicative of   t(oewe1tAIY'   Duplicative of 5 & 8?
                                                     4
                                              Excess policy to 4
                        Paid by easyJet       4 easyJet package        5 AIG                 6
                                              Possibly duplicative   Not declared       Not applicable
                                                   with 1         Not disclosed by EJ
                                                                  Duplicative with 8
                        Third party                  7               8 Diamond               9
                        Diamond insurance      Not applicable    Probably duplicative   Not applicable
                                                                       with 5



                This implies that:
                   •   policie� that resulted in lump sum paymenti for loss of licence for which Mr Solheim
                       (himself had) paid as well as

                   •   an income replacement policy which requires him to make a subrogated claim on
                       behalf of the insurer

                have no effect on - and do not mitigate or duplicate - his claim against Diamond Insurance.
                The declaration omits all mention of the AIG personal accident policy.  This appears to have
                                                                                     5
                been included as a company-wide employee benefit financed by easyJet and not paid for by
                Mr Solheim, himself. It appears that Mr Solheim did not realise he had personal accident
                cover until October 2016 after his licence had been suspended for the second time.  EJ and
                JLT  see






                                                                                                                  Q)
                                                                                                                  00
                                                                                                                  ro
                                                                                                                  Cl..
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112