Page 214 - MJC submissions
P. 214

21. Section 106 Agreement – A binding agreement between the Council and a developer on
                   the occasion of granting a planning permission, regarding matters linked to the proposed
                   development. Used to secure matters necessary to render planning applications acceptable
                   by offsetting the costs of the external effects of development e.g. on local schools, which
                   could not be secured through the imposition of planning conditions
               22. Sustainability – The creation or maintenance of conditions that fulfil current and future
                   economic, environmental and social requirements.

               23. Sustainability Appraisal – Sustainability Appraisal is a tool for appraising policies to ensure
                   that they reflect sustainable development objectives (i.e. social, economic and
                   environmental factors). It is required under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act to
                   be carried out on all Development Plan Documents and Supplementary Planning
                   Documents.

               24. Sustainable Development – Development that meets the needs of the present without
                   compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The National
                   Planning Policy Framework places a requirement on local planning authorities to
                   positively seek opportunities to meet the development needs of their area and guide
                   development to sustainable solutions.
               25. Objectively Assessed Need – The total amount of housing that would be needed to meet,
                   as a minimum, expected levels of growth in population over the plan period. This level of
                   growth expected should take into account demographics (i.e. birth/death rates and
                   migration) and other signals that could influence future trends in demographics
               26. I appreciate that there are inherent conflicts between maximising opportunities for and
                   returns from development and preserving cherished environments: between design and
                   density, amenity and utility. There is also a potentially perverse financial incentive for
                   LPAs to approve applications with a view to benefitting from the Community
                   Infrastructure Levy (CIL). I am not saying this is the case here.

               27. Note from the report on character assessment…… The high Weald area of outstanding
                   natural beauty identifies a number of key issues affecting the future of which the following
                   are relevant to Ashurst Wood:
               28. the erosion of character as a consequence of development which fails to respect the AO
                   NB character in terms of scale, form, design and materials

               29. Under the NPPF, neighbourhood plans are required to demonstrate that a proposed
                   development responds to a local and legitimate need; that dwellings are built in the right
                   place, of the right type and size, and are supported by a commensurate infra-structure.
               30. The AWNP, like all local plans, was driven by an assessment of Objectively Assessed Need
                   (OAN) for 62 new dwellings between 2015 and 2031 and Sustainability Appraisals that
                   identified sites suitable for development.  Ashurst Wood is a Category 3 village for
                   planning purposes.  DdHa xxxx  compared….. already overdeveloped.   It should not be
                   a dumping ground to resolve shortages in adjacent planning areas.
               31. The Steering Group – responsible for preparing the AWNP - concluded that there were 27         Page 8
                   qualifying households on council house waiting lists; only 8 of which made the village
               E:\Cobasco\Personal,  House and computer instructions\EDF and WH Development\MJC
               Plans theories and Objectives\CONSOLIDATED SUBMISSIONS\4a Mr Ashcroft 7th Dec
               2018.docx
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219