Page 39 - The Sales Acceleration Formula: Using Data, Technology, and Inbound Selling to go from $0 to $100 Million - PDFDrive.com
P. 39

Step	2:	Screen	the	Search	Results	Using	the	Details	in	the
Candidate's	LinkedIn	Profile

There	was	a	lot	I	could	learn	about	a	candidate	simply	from	his	profile.	A	brief
screen	helped	me	to	focus	my	sourcing	efforts	on	the	highest-quality	people.	The
top	elements	I	looked	for	in	candidate	profiles	were:

    Indicators	of	sales	excellence.	These	include	rankings	on	their	team,
    consistent	quota	attainment,	President's	Club	attendance,	and	so	forth.

    Longevity	at	their	current/former	employers.	This	was	especially	relevant	for
    candidates	at	companies	I	knew	had	high-performing	sales	teams.	Even	a
    poorly	performing	salesperson	can	survive	at	a	company	for	a	year.	A
    mediocre	salesperson	might	survive	for	two	years.	However,	when	I	spotted
    folks	that	had	made	it	three,	four,	five,	or	more	years	in	a	high-performing
    environment,	I	knew	they	were	likely	to	be	high-value	candidates.

    Alignment	between	the	prospect's	current	buyer	context	and	our	buyer
    context.	Are	they	currently	selling	to	large	enterprises	or	SMBs?	Are	they
    selling	a	commodity	or	a	complex	product?	Is	their	sales	process	more
    relationship-oriented	or	transactional?	These	factors	help	me	assess	the
    learning	curve	for	potential	candidates.	If	these	aspects	do	not	match	my
    buyer	context,	that	is	not	a	showstopper.	I	am	just	looking	for	some	low-
    hanging	fruit.

    School	and	major.	As	we	discussed,	“intelligence”	and	“prior	success”	were
    predictors	of	sales	success	for	me.	The	quality	of	their	school,	the	difficulty
    of	their	major,	and	their	academic	performance	were	all	correlated	with	these
    characteristics.	To	be	honest,	I	think	the	second-tier	schools	produce	the	best
    candidates.	Trust	me—I	hired	plenty	of	successful	salespeople	from	the
    MITs	and	Harvards	of	the	world.	Some	ended	up	being	top	leaders	at
    HubSpot.	However,	many	grew	bored	within	a	sales	organization	and	wanted
    to	achieve	career	progression	faster	than	we	could	accommodate.

    Quality	of	LinkedIn	profiles.	To	be	honest,	this	had	limited	impact	on	my
    screening	process.	However,	a	weak,	photo-less	profile	was	a	huge	red	flag
    for	me.	With	the	growing	importance	of	social	selling,	how	can	a	poor	social
    presence	be	acceptable?	On	the	other	hand,	a	great	profile	with	a
    professionally	taken	photo,	500-plus	connections,	and	loads	of
    recommendations	from	high-level	executives	made	a	really	positive
    impression	on	me.	Again,	I	would	not	get	carried	away	here,	but	any
    candidate	at	either	end	of	the	profile	quality	spectrum	would	influence	my
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44