Page 31 - Benjamin Franklin\'s The Way to Wealth: A 52 brilliant ideas interpretation - PDFDrive.com
P. 31

11 	THE	 DEVIL	 IS	 IN	 THE	 DETAIL

Never	 mind	 what	 they	 say—it	 often	 actually	 pays	 to	 sweat	 the	 small
stuff	 because,	 as	 Franklin	 says,	 ‘adviseth	 to	 circumspection	 and	 care,
even	 in	 the	 smallest	 matters,	 because	 sometimes	 a	 little	 neglect	 may	 breed
great	 mischief’

The	 business	 guru	 Richard	 Carlson	 was	 the	 one	 who	 advised	 us	 ‘don’t
sweat	 the	 small	 stuff’	 but,	 as	 fine	 as	 that	 advice	 may	 sometimes	 be,	 it
should	 really	 go	 straight	 out	 the	 window	 when	 it	 comes	 to	 websites,
communications	 and	 all	 sorts	 of	 promotional	 material.

   DEFINING	 IDEA…
   We	 think	 in	 generalities,	 but	 we	 live	 in	 detail.
   ~	 ALFRED	 NORTH	 WHITEHEAD,	 BRITISH	 MATHEMATICIAN	 AND	 PHILOSOPHER

Back	 in	 the	 mid-90s	 the	 web	 dragged	 itself	 out	 of	 the	 primeval	 swamp	 of
the	 Internet,	 and	 promptly	 evolved	 into	 a	 nerd	 playground	 complete	 with
eye-popping	 games	 and	 porn.	 It’s	 perhaps	 unsurprising,	 then,	 that	 the
business	 world	 still	 retains	 a	 highly	 ambivalent	 attitude	 to	 it	 to	 this	 day.	 A
great	 many	 company	 websites	 were	 initially	 knocked	 together	 by	 some
employee’s	 kid	 brother	 working	 in	 a	 back	 bedroom.	 All	 credit	 to	 the
pioneering	 spirit	 of	 those	 armies	 of	 nascent	 geeks,	 but	 their	 legacy	 is	 that
companies	 a)	 expect	 to	 pay	 for	 all	 sorts	 of	 webbery	 in	 pizzas	 and	 diet	 coke,
b)	 impose	 a	 very	 different	 quality	 threshold	 on	 electronic	 material	 than	 they
would	 for	 a	 printed	 brochure	 or	 other	 literature	 they	 were	 sending	 out,	 and
c)	 still	 have	 terrible	 websites	 that	 look	 like	 they	 were	 knocked	 up	 by	 a
sleep-deprived	 teenager.

Benjamin	 Franklin	 was	 understandably	 ignorant	 of	 the	 wonders	 of	 HTML,
TCP/IP	 and	 Flash	 animation	 but	 he	 nonetheless	 made	 points	 that	 are	 as
relevant	 in	 the	 digital	 domain	 as	 they	 were	 then.	 It’s	 just	 that	 he	 illustrated
the	 point	 with	 horse-shoe	 nails	 rather	 than	 pixels.‘For	 want	 of	 a	 nail	 the
shoe	 was	 lost;	 for	 want	 of	 a	 shoe	 the	 horse	 was	 lost,	 and	 for	 want	 of	 a
horse	 the	 rider	 was	 lost,	 being	 overtaken	 and	 slain	 by	 the	 enemy,	 all	 for
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36