Page 20 - The Art of Learning by Josh Waitzkin_Neat plip book
P. 20

more  of  a  guide  in  my  development  than   as  an  autho rity.  If  I  di sagr eed  with
                him, w e would have a discussion, no t a lectur e.

                    Bruce slowed me down by asking  ques tions . When ever I made an impo rtant
                decision,  good  or  bad,  he  would  ask  me  to  expl ain  my  tho ught   process.  Were
                there  other  ways  to  accomplish  the  same  aim?  Had  I  looked   for  my  oppo ne nt ’s
                threats?  Did  I  consider  a  different  order   of  oper ations ?  Bruce   didn’t  pa troni ze

                me—some  teachers  rebel  so  far  away  from  bei ng  autho ritarian  tha t  the y  pr aise
                all   their   little   player’s   decisions,   good   or   bad.   Thei r   intention   is   to   bui ld
                confidence,  but  instead  they  discour age  obj ectivity,  encour age  self-indul ge nc e,
                and   perhaps   most   destructively,   they    create   a   di sho nes t   relations hi p   be tween

                instructor and pupil that any bright  child can s ense.
                    When    I   made   a   bad   move,   Bruce   asked    me   what    my   idea   was   and   the n
                helped  me  discover  how  I  could  have  appr oached   the  decision- maki ng  pr ocess
                differently.  Much  of  the  time  in  our   lessons   was  spen t  in  silence,  with  us   bo th

                thinking.  Bruce  did  not  want  to  feed  me  inf ormation,     but   to  help   my  mind
                carve   itself   into   maturity.   Over    time,   in   his   coaxing,   hum orous ,   and
                understatedly     firm   manner,    Bruce    gav e   me   a   foundat ion   of   critical   che ss
                principles  and  a  systematic  understandi ng      of  analysis  and   calculation.   Whi le

                the   new   knowledge     was   valuable,   the   most   impo rtant   factor   in   the se   fi  st
                months  of  study  was  that  Bruce  nur tur ed  my  love  for  ches s,  and   he   ne ver  let
                technical material smother my innate feeling f or the g ame.
                    During    these   early   months   of   work   with   Bruce,   we   woul d   meet   onc e   or

                twice a week in my family’s apartment—sometimes early mornings,  sometimes
                after  school.  Most  other  days,  I  woul d  go   to  Washi ngt on  Squar e  and   duke   it
                out  with  my  friends  in  the  park.  As  a  six-  and   seven-year-old   boy  I  ha d   two
                powerful currents to my chess education,  and  the  key was to make the m coexist

                peacefully—the      street-tough     compet itor   had    to   fus e   with   the    classically
                trained,  patient  player  that  Bruce  was  inspi ring.   Tho ugh   when   very  young    I
                was  periodically  reluctant  about  real  chess  work,  I  loved  the  subl ime  be aut y  of
                old  World  Championship  games  I  studi ed  with  Bruce—s ometimes  sitting             in

                silence  and  calculating  an  endgame  position      for  twenty  minut es  woul d   thr ill
                me  to  the  core.  But  other  times  such   serious   thi nki ng  woul d  bore  me  and  I’d
                hunger  to  play  speed  chess  with  my  buddi es,  to  attack,  to  be  a  little  reckl ess
                and create beautiful combinations. T he p ark w as fun. I  was a chi ld a fter all.

                    Despite  significant  outside  pressur e,  my  par ents  and  Bruce  deci de d  to  ke ep
                me  out  of  tournaments  until  I  had  been  playing  ches s  for  a  year  or  so,  be caus e
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25