Page 21 - The Art of Learning by Josh Waitzkin_Neat plip book
P. 21

they wanted my relationship to the  game to be  abo ut  learni ng  and  pa ssion  fi      st,
                and   competition    a   distant   second.   My   mother    and   Bruce   were   pa rticul arly

                ambivalent  about  exposing  me  to  the      har sh   pressur es  of  compet itive  che ss—
                they  gave  me  some  extra  months  of  inno cence  for  whi ch  I  am  grateful .  Whe n  I
                finally   started   playing    in   scholastic   tour nam ents,   soon   after   my   sevent h
                birthday,  the  games  felt  easy.  Childr en  my  own  age  didn’t  fashi on  compl icated

                attacks  and  defenses  like  the  guys  in   the   park   di d,   and   they   woul d   crum bl e
                under  pressure.   Some  of  the  kids  were  armed  with     dan ger ous   ope ni ng   traps ,
                memorized variations that could lead  to early adv antages, so I often came out  of
                the  opening  down  a  pawn  or  two—but   then   they   didn’t  have  a  chanc e.  Fo r  me,

                competitive  chess  was  not  about  per fection.  It  was  more  of  a  mental  prizefight,
                with  two  opponents  trading  advant ages,  momentum   going          one  way  and   the n
                the   other.   My   friends   in   Washingt on   Squar e   were   valiant    compe titors,   you
                could  never  count  them  out—in  fact  they   were  most  danger ous   whe n  on  the

                ropes.   Many    very   talented   kids   expect ed   to   win   witho ut    muc h   resistanc e.
                When the game was a struggle, t hey  were emotional ly unpr epared.
                    I thrived under adversity.  My style was to make the  game compl ex and  the n
                work    my   way   through   the   chaos.   When    the   po sition   was   wild,   I   ha d   huge

                confidence.  Bruce  and  I  also  spent  a  lot  of  time  study ing  endgam es,  whe re  the
                board is nearly empty and high-level princi ples combi ne  with  deep  calcul ations
                to   create   fascinating   battles.   Whi le   my   oppo nen ts   wanted   to   win   in   the
                openings,  right  off  the  bat,  I  guided   positions   into  compl icated  middl ega mes

                and  abstract  endings.  So  as  the  game  went  on,    thei r  con      ce  shr ank   and   I
                became a predator. Noticing these tenden cies, Bruce  started calling  me “Tige r.”
                He still calls me Tiger today.
                    My   first   year   of   competitive   chess   was   smooth   sailing.   I   felt   unbe atabl e

                when  matched  up  with  kids  my  age,  and  the  combi nat ion  of  street  toughne ss
                and  classical  education  proved  devastating  for  my  oppo nen ts.  Perha ps   the   most
                decisive   element    of   my   game   was   the   way   my   style   on   the    bo ard   was
                completely     in   synch   with   my   personal ity   as   a   chi ld.   I   was   unhi nde red   by

                internal conflict—a state of being that  I hav e come to see as fundam ent al to the
                learning process. Bruce and the park  guy s had  taught  me how to expr ess myself
                through chess, an d so my love for the g ame grew every day.
                    As  the  months  went  by,    I  piled  up   win   after  win   and   my  nat iona l  rating

                skyrocketed.  I’d  show  up  at  a  tournam ent  and  kids  were  terrified  of  me,  which
                felt strange.  I was,  after all,  a young  child  who  was scared of the  dark  and  loved
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26