Page 36 - The Art of Learning by Josh Waitzkin_Neat plip book
P. 36

positions  of  reduced  complexity  and  clear  pr inci ples.  Our   fi  st  focus   was  ki ng
                and  pawn  against  king—just  three  pi eces  on  the  table.  Over  time,  I  ga ine d  an

                excellent intuitive feel for the power of the  king  and  the  subt lety of the  pa wn.  I
                learned   the   principle   of   opposition,   the   hi dden    potency   of   empt y   spa ce,   the
                idea   of   zugzwang   (putting   your   opponent   in   a   position   wher e   any    move   he
                makes  will  destroy  his  position).  Layer  by  layer  we  bui lt  up  my  kno wledge   and

                my  understanding  of  how  to  transform  axioms  into  fuel  for  creative  insight.  Then  we
                turned  to  rook  endings,  bishop  endi ngs ,  kni ght   endi ngs ,  spen di ng  hundr eds   of
                hours  as  I  turned  seven  and  eight  years  old,  expl oring  the  oper ating  pr inc ipl es
                behind  positions  that  I  might  never  see  again.  This  method  of  study   gave  me  a

                feeling   for   the   beautiful   subtleties   of   each   chess   pi ece,   because   in   relatively
                clear-cut   positions   I   could   focus   on   what    was   essential.   I   was   also   gr adua lly
                internalizing     a   marvelous    metho do logy    of   learni ng—t he    play   be tween
                knowledge,     intuition,   and   creativity.   Fr om   bo th   educat ional    and   techni cal

                perspectives, I  learned from the foundat ion up.
                    Most of my rivals,  on the other hand,  began by study ing  open ing  variations .
                There is a vast body of theory that begins  from the  starting  position  of all che ss
                games,   and  it  is  very  tempting  to  teach  chi ldr en  open ings   right   off  the   ba t,

                because  built  into  this  theoretical  part  of  the   gam e  ther e  are  many  imbe dde d
                traps,  land  mines  that  allow  a  player  to  win  qui ckly  and  easily—i n  effect,  to
                win  without  having  to  struggle  to  win.  At  first  tho ught ,  it  seems  logi cal  for  a
                novice  to  study  positions  that  he  or  she   will  see  all  the   time  at  the   out set  of

                games.    Why    not   begin   from   the   beginni ng,   especi ally   if   it   leads    to   ins tant
                success?  The  answer  is  quicksand.     Once   you   start  with   open ings ,   the re  is  no
                way  out.  Lifetimes  can  be  spent  memorizing  and  keepi ng  up  with  the   evolving
                Encyclopedia  of  Chess  Openings  (ECO).  They   are  an  addi ction,      with  pe rilous

                psychological effects.
                    It is a little like developing the habi t of stealing  the  test from your  teache r’s
                desk  instead  of  learning  how  to  do   the  math.  You  may  pas s  the  test,  but   you
                learn  absolutely  nothing—and  most  critically,  you  do n’t  gai n  an  appr eciation

                for   the   value   or   beauty   of   learni ng   itself.   For   childr en   who    focus    early   on
                openings,    chess   becomes    about   resul ts.   Period.   It   doesn’t   matter   ho w   you
                played  or  if  you  concentrated  well  or  if  you  were  br ave.  Thes e  ki ds   talk  abo ut
                the   4   move   mate   and   ask   each   other,   “How   many   moves   di d   it   take    you   to

                win”? Chess becomes one-dimensional —winni ng an d w inni ng f ast.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41