Page 47 - January 2020 IIssue new year
P. 47
Elite Investigative Journal
Impact of Corporal Punishment on the Students in Primary and Secondary Schools, pg 47-53
©2014-2020 SYT Global, Inc.
Impact of Corporal Punishment on the Students in
Primary and Secondary Schools
By Mamona Atif
acceptance represented by of awareness; applying CP
Problem of the study the school and social ac- on their children at home;
ceptance represented by and refrain from reporting
Although current policy parents. This phenomenon actively their children’s
concerning violence in
schools states that cor-
poral punishment is
banned, we find that it is
being widely practiced in
schools as a common tool
for discipline with barely
parents’ ability to stop
or report it. Reporting is
usually for extreme cases
reported about serious
injuries or even death of
children that are published Photo Courtesy of google.com
to the public such as the is stirred by administrative exposure to assault believ-
death of a child in one of acceptance represented ing that the school will not
Punjab schools as a result by the school through not take deterrent action.
of a teacher’s beating. implementing the policy
There is little record on effectively; lack of com- This study shows that CP
child abuse or child death munication with family; is widespread in schools
resulting from violence. inability to find alterna- especially in public
tive means of discipline schools. This failure of
Possible reasons for ex- to teachers; and margin- implementation was main-
panding the use of corpo- alizing the role of social ly attributed to administra-
ral punishment in schools workers. Social accep- tive and social acceptance.
in spite of its legal ban tance is exemplified by We will consider in this
could be administrative parents’ acceptance; lack chapter how to reduce
47