Page 28 - Gastrointestinal Bleeding (Xuất huyết tiêu hóa)
P. 28

302     PART III  Symptoms, Signs, and Biopsychosocial Issues


         remain uncomplicated. Bleeding may occur from vessels at the   actual rate of rebleeding appears to be lower. In a large prospec-
         neck or base of a diverticulum. 261  In our experience with defin-  tive cohort study of patients with documented colonic diverticular
         itive diverticular hemorrhage (see later), bleeding was from the   hemorrhage (definitive or presumptive) by our group, the overall
         base in 52% and from the neck in 48% of diverticula. 262  rate of rebleeding was 18% in 4 years—9% from recurrent diver-
            Diverticula are common in Western countries, with a fre-  ticular hemorrhage and 9% from other GI sources. 262
         quency of 50% in older adults. 263  By contrast, diverticula are
         found in fewer than 1% of continental African and Asian popula-  Endoscopic Stigmata
         tions. 264  It has been hypothesized that the regional differences in   About  one third of  patients  with true diverticular  hemorrhage
         prevalence rates can be explained by the low amount of dietary   (presumptive  or  definitive)  during  urgent  colonoscopy  follow-
         fiber in Western diets (see Chapter 121). Diverticular bleeding   ing adequate cleansing have a stigma of recent bleeding, such as
         develops in an estimated 3% to 5% of patients with diverticu-  active bleeding, a visible vessel, an adherent clot, or a flat spot
         losis. 265  Although most diverticula are in the left colon, several   in a single diverticulum. 237,262  As noted, earlier colonoscopy for
         series have suggested that diverticula in the right colon are more   LGI bleeding is likely to result in a greater frequency of finding
         likely to bleed. 265,267,268  Two thirds of definitive diverticular   SRH, although a small case series study from the Mayo Clinic did
         bleeds (with SRH) emanate from the region of the splenic flexure   not find any difference in the rate of detection of these stigmata
         of the colon or proximally. 262                      whether colonoscopy was performed between 0 and 12 hours, 12
            Diverticular hemorrhage should be classified carefully based   and 24 hours, or more than 24 hours from the time of hospital
         on findings at colonoscopy, angiography, or surgery,  particu-  admission. 257
                                                   28
         larly in the case of older patients with severe hematochezia who   Stratifying the risk of diverticular rebleeding by applying the
         are  likely  to  have  colonic  diverticulosis.  Definitive  diverticular   same endoscopic stigmata used in high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
         hemorrhage is diagnosed when SRH (e.g., active bleeding, visible   (active bleeding, NBVV, and clot) has been advocated. For exam-
         vessel, adherent clot) are seen on colonoscopy or active bleeding   ple, as in histopathologic examination of resection specimens of
         is demonstrated on angiography or radionuclide imaging, with   bleeding ulcers with visible vessels, the pigmented protuberance
         later confirmation of a diverticulum in that location as the source   found on the edge of some diverticula is an organized clot over
         of bleeding by colonoscopy or surgery. Presumptive diverticular   an underlying ruptured blood vessel on histopathology (Fig.
         hemorrhage is diagnosed when colonoscopy reveals diverticulo-  20.19). 271  The short-term natural history associated with each of
         sis  without  stigmata,  and  no  other  significant  lesions  are  seen   these stigmata has been reported to be similar to that for stigmata
         in the colon and by anoscopy, terminal ileum examination, and   associated with peptic ulcer hemorrhage. 272  Of medically treated
         push enteroscopy. The term incidental diverticulosis is used when   patients with active bleeding from a diverticulum, 83% (15 of 18)
         another lesion is identified as the cause of hematochezia, and   rebled and 56% required intervention (surgery or angiographic
         colonic diverticulosis is evident. In a large prospective cohort   embolization) for hemostasis. In patients with an NBVV in a sin-
         study in which the management algorithm shown in Fig. 20.4 was   gle diverticulum, the rate of rebleeding was 60% and the rate of
         used in our institutions to classify patients with hematochezia,   intervention for hemostasis was 40%. In patients with an adher-
         colonic diverticulosis was incidental in 52%, presumptive diver-  ent clot treated medically, the rebleeding rate was 43% and the
         ticular hemorrhage occurred in 31%, and definitive diverticular   rate of intervention was 29%. For the entire group of 37 patients
         hemorrhage was established in 17% of cases. 237      with  these  high-risk  stigmata,  the  rebleeding  rate  on  medical
            Patients  with  diverticular  bleeding  are  typically  older,  have   therapy was 65% and the rate of intervention was 43%. These
         been taking aspirin or other NSAID, and present with painless   rebleeding and intervention rates are worse than those for peptic
         hematochezia. 269,270  In at least 75% of patients with diverticular   ulcer hemorrhage because there are no drugs similar to PPIs that
         bleeding, the bleeding stops spontaneously, and these patients   can be used to reduce the rebleeding risk in patients with high-
         require transfusion of fewer than 4 units of packed RBCs. In one   risk SRH.
         surgical series, surgical segmental colonic resection was performed   UCLA CURE hemostasis studies using a DEP have detected
         in 60% of patients, most of whom had had continued bleeding   underlying blood flow in 91% of patients with major SRH (active
         despite transfusion of 4 units of blood. 267  Patients who under-  bleeding, NBVV, or adherent clot) but in no patient without
         went resection for a bleeding diverticulum had a rebleeding rate   these stigmata. The DEP has also been used for risk stratifica-
         of 4%. Among patients who stopped bleeding spontaneously, the   tion of patients with flat spots in diverticula during urgent colo-
         rebleeding rate from colonic diverticulosis has been reported to   noscopy for hemorrhage and as a guide to the completeness of
         range from 25% to 38% over the next 4 years, with most patients   hemostasis in patients with SRH. 273  With  DEP guidance to
         having mild rebleeding. 235,267  These data, however, are not based   obliterate blood flow, the rebleeding rates have been less than
         on colonoscopic documentation of diverticular bleeding, and the   5% in 30 days. 272,273  

















             A                                B                             C


                        Fig. 20.19   Endoscopic stigmata of recent colonic diverticular bleeding. A, Active bleeding (arrow). B, Adher-
                      ent clot (arrow). C, Nonbleeding visible vessel (arrow).
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33