Page 27 - Gastrointestinal Bleeding (Xuất huyết tiêu hóa)
P. 27

CHAPTER 20  Gastrointestinal Bleeding  301


             CT and CT Colonography                               A prospective study revealed no difference between urgent (≤12
                                                                  hours after presentation) and elective (36 to 60 hours after pre-  20
             Multidetector CT can identify abnormalities in the colon that   sentation) colonoscopy in terms of further bleeding, blood trans-
                                                                                                   9
             could be a source of bleeding, such as diverticulosis, colitis,   fusions, hospital days, or hospital charges.  Early colonoscopy
             masses, and varices. CT is often performed if the patient is hav-  (soon after admission) has been associated with a shorter length
             ing hematochezia with abdominal pain. One study from France   of hospitalization, principally because of improved diagnostic
             reported that CT accurately identified 17 of 19 LGI bleeding   yield rather than therapeutic intervention. 258
             sites, including diverticula, tumors, angiomas, and varices. 253    A consensus on a single approach to patients with severe hema-
             Multidetector CT has been shown to be more accurate than   tochezia has not been reached, and the approach used depends
             technetium-tagged RBC scanning in patients with LGI bleed-  on local resources and expertise. In large centers, the approach
             ing. 254                                             detailed in  Fig. 20.4 is recommended. With use of an urgent
               CT colonography is being used increasingly to screen per-  endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment, the diagnostic
             sons for colonic polyps and cancer and may be of some benefit in   yield of definitive and presumptive bleeding sites is more than
             patients with LGI bleeding (see Chapter 127). CT colonography   90%, and the estimated direct costs are significantly less than the
                                                                                                   28
             detects large polyps (>1 cm) or cancers with a sensitivity rate of   costs associated with an elective evaluation.  
             90%. 255  Faster multidetector scanners also allow CT angiogra-
             phy to be performed, as well as evaluation of the small bowel.   Barium Enema
             This  capability  could  allow  detection  of  masses  and  vascular
             lesions and is a potential advantage of CT angiography over other   Emergency barium enema has no role in patients with LGI
             radiologic imaging techniques.                       bleeding. This test is rarely diagnostic because it cannot demon-
               Multidetector CT has been proposed as an early diagnostic   strate vascular lesions and may be misleading if only diverticula
             step in patients with suspected colonic bleeding  to help direct   are seen. It fails to detect 50% of polyps larger than 10 mm. 259
             colonoscopic evaluation. 256  Because this approach may expose the   In addition, the barium contrast liquid can make urgent colonos-
             patient to unnecessary radiation, and because nearly all patients   copy more difficult by impairing visualization and delaying other
             will undergo either urgent or elective colonoscopy anyway, CT   studies such as angiography. Subsequent colonoscopy is required
             colonography is unlikely to play an important role in the acute   for any suspicious lesions seen on barium enema or for lesions
             evaluation of patients with LGI bleeding. Moreover, CT angio-  that require therapy. 
             graphic IV contrast can cause acute kidney injury in patients with
             renal insufficiency.                                 Role of Surgery

             Colonoscopy                                          Surgical management is rarely needed in patients with LGI bleed-
                                                                  ing because most bleeding is self-limited or easily managed with
             Urgent colonoscopy following a rapid bowel purge has been   medical or endoscopic therapy. The main indications for surgery
             shown to be safe, provide important diagnostic information, and   are malignancy, diffuse bleeding that fails to cease with medi-
             allow therapeutic intervention. 236,237  Patients usually ingest 6   cal therapy (as in ischemic colitis or UC), and recurrent bleeding
             to 8 L of PEG solution orally or via an NG tube over 4 to 6   from a diverticulum. At present, most patients are managed on a
             hours until the rectal effluent is clear of stool, blood, and clots.   medical service rather than on a surgical service. 
             Metoclopramide, in a dose of 10 mg, may be given intravenously
             before the purge and repeated every 3 to 4 hours to facilitate gas-  Causes and Management
             tric emptying and reduce nausea. Owing to the potential risks of
             high sodium and phosphate loads, sodium phosphate bowel prep-  Visualizing  active bleeding  during  colonoscopy  is not  always
             arations should probably be avoided in patients with suspected   possible, but colonoscopy permits identification of SRH (vis-
             LGI bleeding.                                        ible vessels, adherent clot, or spots) and provides information on
               Urgent colonoscopy for LGI bleeding is generally performed   the location of the lesion and on risk stratification. The earlier a
             6 to 24 hours after the patient is admitted to the hospital. Most   colonoscopy is carried out, the higher the chance of detecting an
             bleeding stops spontaneously,  and thus, colonoscopy is often   actively bleeding lesion or SRH. A definite diagnosis of a bleed-
             performed semi-electively on the day after initial hospitalization   ing lesion can usually be made if active bleeding, a visible vessel,
             to allow the patient to receive blood transfusions and the bowel   or a clot is seen. A presumptive diagnosis of the cause of bleed-
             preparation on the first day of hospitalization.     ing can be made if a lesion that is a potential cause of bleeding is
               The overall rate of detecting a presumed or definite cause of   seen and no other possible sources are identified by anoscopy, full
             LGI bleeding by colonoscopy ranges from 48% to 90%, with an   colonoscopy with intubation of the terminal ileum, and, in some
             average of 68%, based on a review of 13 studies. 238  The prob-  cases, push enteroscopy. 28
             lem with interpreting these data, however, is that making a defi-
             nite diagnosis of the cause of the bleeding is often not possible   Diverticulosis
             unless a bleeding stigma such as active bleeding, a visible vessel,
             an adherent clot, a flat spot, mucosal friability or ulceration, or   Colonic diverticula are herniations of colonic mucosa and sub-
             the presence of fresh blood limited to a specific segment of the   mucosa through the muscular layers of the colon (see Chapter
             colon is seen.                                       121). Histopathologically, diverticula in the colon are actu-
               The  optimal  time  for  performing  urgent  bowel  prepara-  ally  pseudodiverticula  because  they  do  not  contain  all  layers
             tion and colonoscopy is unknown. Theoretically, the sooner an   of the colonic wall. Diverticula form when colonic tissue is
             endoscopy is performed, the higher the likelihood of finding a   pushed out by intraluminal pressure at points of entry of the
             lesion  (e.g.,  bleeding  diverticulum,  polyp  stalk)  with  stigmata   small arteries (vasa recta), where they penetrate the circular
             that might be amenable to endoscopic hemostasis. A retrospec-  muscle layer of the colonic wall. The entry points of the vasa
             tive study from the Mayo Clinic, however, suggested that in   recta are areas of relative weakness through which the mucosa
             patients with diverticular bleeding, the timing of endoscopy (0 to   and submucosa can herniate when intraluminal pressure is
             12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, or more than 24 hours after admission)   increased. 261  Diverticula vary in diameter from a few millime-
             is not significantly associated with the finding of active bleeding   ters to several centimeters and are located most commonly in
             or other stigmata that would prompt colonoscopic hemostasis. 257    the left colon. Most colonic diverticula are asymptomatic and
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32