Page 13 - Acute Pancreatitis (Viêm tụy cấp)
P. 13

904     PART VII   Pancreas


         taking thiopurines developed AP. 161   Celiac disease 162  has also   pancreas divisum is associated with genetic abnormalities and not
         been described in association with pancreatitis, but the relation-  solely due to pancreas divisum. This observation along with the
         ship remains uncertain. It has been suggested that abnormalities   finding that minor papilla endoscopic therapy is associated with
         in the normal barrier of the small bowel seen in patients with   significant amount of complications like stricture should make
         celiac disease may allow excessive absorption of amylase from the   one think carefully before subjecting patients with pancreas divi-
         intestinal lumen, leading to hyperamylasemia. In the setting of   sum and AP to invasive therapy. Every effort should be made to
         abdominal pain in a patient with celiac disease, it is not uncom-  seek other causes of such attacks of AP. Therefore, it may not be
         mon to find elevations in the serum amylase in the absence of   the presence of pancreas divisum alone that predisposes to AP,
         AP. 163  Pancreatitis has been seen in patients after severe burns. 164  but other factors may be necessary to precipitate an attack. (See
            Autoimmune pancreatitis (discussed in the next chapter in   the earlier discussion in the section on genetic factors.) 174  
         more detail). AP or recurrent AP resulting from autoimmune
         pancreatitis is rare, seen in type II disease, and is associated with   SOD (See Chapter 63)
         granulocyte epithelial lesions. 165  Investigators have also described
         patients with autoimmune recurrent pancreatitis, especially in   SOD is also a controversial cause of AP. Investigators who study
         younger women, often without the classic elevation of serum   patients with recurrent AP report that SOD (usually defined as a
         IgG4. 166                                            basal pancreatic sphincter pressure >40 mm Hg) is the most com-
            As discussed in Chapter 53, PUD (penetrating duodenal or gas-  mon abnormality discovered, occurring in approximately 35% to
         tric  ulcers) can involve the pancreas and cause pancreatitis that   40% of patients. The main argument in favor of this entity as
         may be fatal. Though uncommon nowadays, penetrating ulcer   a cause of AP is the many observational series that report that
         as a cause of pancreatitis should be considered in the appropriate   endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy or surgical sphinctero-
         clinical setting. 167                                plasty reduces recurrent attacks of pancreatitis. 174  The arguments
                                                              against SOD as a cause of AP include: (1) the lack of any prospec-
                                                              tive  controlled  blinded  trials  in  the  treatment  of  this  disorder;
         Controversial Causes                                 (2) the short duration of follow-up in the observational reports;
         Pancreas Divisum                                     (3) the high risk of pancreatitis (25% to 35%) associated with
                                                              ERCP, sphincter of Oddi manometry, and pancreatic sphinc-
         Pancreas divisum is the most common congenital malformation   terotomy in patients with suspected SOD; (4) the extremely
         of the pancreas, occurring in 5% to 10% of the general healthy   variable natural history of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis,
         population, the vast majority of whom never develop pancreatitis   which may mask the minimal effects of therapy 175 ; and (5) the
         (see Chapter 55). Controversy continues to surround the issue   relative dearth of data determining the normal range of pancre-
         as to whether pancreas divisum with otherwise normal ductular   atic sphincter pressure that is the basis for the pathogenesis of
         anatomy is a cause of acute recurrent pancreatitis. 168  The pre-  SOD. 175  Although one could debate if idiopathic recurrent AP
         sumed mechanism of action in those who develop pancreatitis is   can be labeled as type 2 SOD, a large number of patients with
         that there is relative obstruction to the flow of pancreatic juice   abdominal pain after cholecystectomy, but no objective evidence
         through  the minor papilla.  Arguments in favor  of attributing   of biliary or pancreatic disease is subjected to ERCP, sphincter of
         pancreatitis to pancreas divisum include: (1) various series from   Oddi manometry, and biliary and or pancreatic sphincterotomy
         ERCP referral centers show that patients referred with recur-  with a diagnosis of type 3 SOD. For patients with type 3 SOD,
         rent AP have a higher frequency of pancreas divisum than would   the results of a large rigorously conducted multicenter RCT, the
         be expected from the general population; (2) multiple observa-  EPISOD trial, has been published. 176  The trial concluded that in
         tional series report that performing endoscopic sphincterotomy   patients with abdominal pain after cholecystectomy undergoing
         or placing a stent across the minor papilla reduces the rate of   ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy versus sham sphincter-
         recurrent pancreatitis 169 ; and (3) there is a small randomized   otomy did not reduce disability due to pain. These findings do
         controlled study suggesting that patients with pancreas divisum   not support ERCP and sphincterotomy for these patients. 
         who undergo duct stenting for 1 year have a lower frequency
         of attacks of pancreatitis than those not stented. 170  Arguments   CLINICAL FEATURES
         against the association include: (1) there are other studies show-
         ing that the incidence of pancreatitis in pancreas divisum patients   It is difficult to diagnose AP by history and physical examina-
         is  the same  as  the  general  population 171 ;  (2)  the observational   tion, because clinical features are similar to those of many acute
         reports are flawed in that follow-up was not long enough (usually   abdominal illnesses (Box 58.6).
         only 1 to 2 years) and that recurrent AP is a disease of great vari-
         ability 151 ; (3) the single randomized study 170  was flawed in that it   History
         was not blinded, had only 19 patients, and its patients probably
         had chronic pancreatitis in that they had multiple pain attacks in   Abdominal pain is present at the onset of most attacks of AP.
         between attacks of AP. In addition, when considering the lack   Biliary pain may herald or progress to AP. Pain in pancreatitis
         of evidence, it is worth considering the high risk of endoscopic   usually involves the entire upper abdomen. However, it may be
         therapy in causing PEP in patients with pancreas divisum, there-
         fore making the risk-benefit ratio of treating pancreas divisum
         endoscopically questionable.                           BOX 58 .6   Differential Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis

            The prevalence of genetic  abnormalities in patients with
         pancreas divisum and acute recurrent pancreatitis are either the   Biliary pain
         same 171  or higher 172  than expected in the general population or   Acute cholecystitis
         population of patients with AP of other etiologies, suggesting a   Perforated hollow viscus (e.g., perforated peptic ulcer)
         possible genetic contribution. For example, there appears to be   Mesenteric ischemia or infarction
         a higher incidence of CFTR mutations in patients with pancreas   Intestinal obstruction
         divisum who develop AP. 173  Because several authors reported   Myocardial infarction
         associations  of  SPINK-1 and  CFTR mutations  in patients  with   Dissecting aortic aneurysm
         AP and pancreas divisum, expert review suggested that idiopathic   Ectopic pregnancy
         pancreatitis  (either  acute  or  acute  recurrent)  in  a  patient  with
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18