Page 18 - Acute Pancreatitis (Viêm tụy cấp)
P. 18

CHAPTER 58  Acute Pancreatitis  909


             further attacks of pancreatitis. Alcoholic pancreatitis occurs more   number of reports predicting moderately severe AP, which has
             frequently in men approximately 40 years old. The first clinical   been included in the revised Atlanta classification. 233  However,   58
             episode usually occurs after 5 to 10 years of heavy alcohol con-  despite a large body of literature, no perfect predictor is available
             sumption. By contrast, biliary pancreatitis is more frequent in   at the present time. Most predictors have a very high negative
             women, and the first clinical episode is often after the age of 40   predictive value but not a useful PPV, and this is because a sig-
             years. Recurrent attacks of AP suggest an alcohol etiology, but   nificant proportion of the patients with AP do not develop mod-
             unrecognized gallstones may cause recurrent pancreatitis. Among   erately severe or severe disease. From 2 prospectively collected
             patients with acute biliary pancreatitis discharged from the hos-  cohorts, it was reported that the existing scoring systems seem to
             pital without cholecystectomy, 30% to 50% develop recurrent   have reached their maximal efficacy in predicting persistent organ
             AP relatively soon after discharge (average time to recurrent pan-  failure in AP. Sophisticated combinations of predictive rules are
             creatitis, 108 days). 227  Thus removing the gallbladder in biliary   more accurate but cumbersome to use, and therefore of limited
             pancreatitis is imperative.                          clinical use. Our ability to predict the severity of AP cannot be
               Laboratory tests may help distinguish between these 2 disor-  expected to improve unless we develop new approaches. 234  A
             ders. The specificity for gallstone pancreatitis of a serum ALT   recent systematic review looking at predictors of persistent organ
             concentration greater than 150 IU/L (≈3-fold elevation) is 96%;   failure (severe AP) and infected pancreatic necrosis observed that
             the PPV is 95%, but the sensitivity is only 48%. 205  The serum   it is justifiable to use the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level for
             AST concentration is nearly as useful as the ALT, but the total   prediction of persistent organ failure after 48 hours of admission
             bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase concentrations are not as help-  and procalcitonin for prediction of infected pancreatic necrosis
             ful to distinguish gallstone pancreatitis from alcoholic and other   in patients with confirmed pancreatic necrosis. 234  There was no
             etiologies. There are differing reports as to whether a high serum   predictor of persistent organ failure found that can be justifiably
             lipase-to-amylase ratio can differentiate alcoholic from other   used in clinical practice within 48 hours of admission. 235  What
             causes of pancreatitis. 228,229                      is really required is a system or a marker that has high PPV for
               Conventional abdominal US should be performed in every   moderately severe or severe AP. Along the same lines, the most
             patient with a first attack of AP to search for gallstones in the   recent AGA technical review on early management of AP found
             gallbladder, common duct stones, or signs of extrahepatic bili-  no  studies  using  a  predictive  tool that  improved  clinical  out-
             ary tract obstruction. However, bile duct stones are frequently   comes. 236  Hence it recommended using clinical judgment and a
             missed by abdominal US, and most stones pass during the acute   variety of predictive tools in clinical practice. It is for the same
             attack. ERCP is limited to patients with severe AP due to gall-  reason that this particular approach of predicting severity was not
             stones with persistent bile duct obstruction and to those patients   included in the meta-analysis in the same technical review. Thus
             in whom the stone could not be removed during surgery. In most   many of the predictors will be listed below briefly, with added
             patients with biliary pancreatitis, common duct stones pass and   information on some predictors that were widely studied. At the
             no further evaluation is needed. Although the bile duct can be   present time, most of these systems are more useful for research
             imaged with an operative cholangiogram at the time of laparo-  purposes and to compare different cohorts, rather than being use-
             scopic cholecystectomy  performed during the same admission,   ful in directing clinical care.
             this is not necessary in most patients.                Recent guidelines and reviews recommended the following
               Many clinicians prefer to evaluate the bile duct prior to sur-  predictors at admission to be useful while considered together
             gery. Because most stones that cause biliary pancreatitis pass, it is   with clinical judgement: advanced age (>60 years), BMI, Charl-
             not clear who should undergo evaluation. ERCP would be inap-  son’s comorbidity index, pleural effusions or infiltrates on the
             propriate in a patient with a moderate to low risk of choledo-  admission chest radiograph, elevated hematocrit, elevated BUN
             cholithiasis, when the risk of PEP is greater than the benefit of   level, elevated serum creatinine level, and CRP >15 mg/dL at 48
             ERCP (normal-sized bile duct and normal liver chemistry tests).   hours. 1,211,237
             However, if the bile duct is dilated and/or liver chemistry tests are   The height of elevation of the serum amylase and lipase does
             elevated, further evaluation prior to surgery may be reasonable.   not correlate with severity. However, in pediatric AP, it was
             Although EUS is an accurate method of detecting bile duct stones   reported that a 7-fold elevation of lipase predicted severe dis-
             and has been recommended for evaluating the bile duct prior to   ease with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predic-
             cholecystectomy, it is rarely needed or used in this setting. 230  It   tive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 85%,
             should be reserved for the patient who has findings suspicious for   56%, 46%, 89%, 1.939, and 0.27, respectively. 197  When AP is
             a retained stone and cannot undergo MRCP. MRCP is as accu-  superimposed on chronic pancreatitis, it is usually less severe than
             rate, but because of its noninvasive approach, it is preferred if a   AP without chronic pancreatitis. When superimposed on chronic
             clinician has a lower suspicion that a common duct stone may be   pancreatitis, weight loss, advanced age, and comorbidities pre-
             present. If a common duct stone is found at surgery, it is either   dict severity in a population-based study. 237  Radial EUS in acute
             removed during the operation or endoscopically after surgery. 231    biliary pancreatitis showed a significant relationship between the
             Laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct is as safe and effective as   severity of AP with diffuse parenchymal edema, periparenchymal
             postoperative ERCP in clearing stones from the common duct. 232    plastering, and/or diffuse retroperitoneal free fluid accumulation,
                                                                  and peri-pancreatic edema, and also predicted mortality. 238  In a
             PREDICTORS OF DISEASE SEVERITY                       large administrative database, transferred patients with AP have
                                                                  more severe disease and higher overall mortality. Mortality is
             According to the revised Atlanta classification there are 3 grades   similar after adjusting for disease severity. Disease severity, insur-
             of severity of AP: mild, moderate, and severe. Nearly 80% of the   ance status, race, and age all influence the decision to transfer
             patients have mild AP. Predicting the severity is very important   patients with AP. 239
             during the first 24 to 72 hours, mostly at admission and during   A large number of clinical and laboratory predictors of severity
             the first 24 hours. If such prediction suggests moderate or severe   have been described in recent years. They include procalcitonin, 240
             type of the disease, it may help communicate with the patient   TNF-α, 241  thrombopoetin, 242  carboxypeptidase-B activation
             about the course of the disease; triage them to intensive care or   peptide, 243  polymorphonuclear elastase, PLA 2 , D-dimer in pedi-
             step-up unit; and when specific interventions become available,   atric AP, 244,245  higher urinary beta 2 microglobulin to saposin B
             administer them early on. A variety of clinical features, labora-  ratio, 246  hepcidin, 247  elevated levels of soluble B7-H2 (sB7-H2), 248
             tory markers, and scoring systems have been described over the   copeptin, 249   IL-6, 250   IL-17,  IL-23, 251   melatonin, 252   resistin, 253
             years to predict severe AP. There has been an extremely limited   lower serum lipid concentrations, 254  mean platelet volume, 255
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23