Page 318 - Darwinism Refuted

DARWINISM REFUTED

Coming to Terms with the Shocks
As we recently stressed, materialism is the belief that categorically
rejects the existence of the nonmaterial (or the "supernatural"). Science, on
the other hand, is under no obligation to accept such a dogma. The duty
of science is to observe nature and produce results.
And science does reveal the fact that living things were created. This is
something demonstrated by scientific discoveries. When we examine the
fantastically complex structures in living things, we see that they possess
such extraordinary features that they can never be accounted for by natural
processes and coincidences. Every instance of extraordinary feature is
evidence for an intelligence that brought it into being; therefore, we must
conclude that life, too, was created by a power. This power belongs to a
nonmaterial wisdom—the superior wisdom of the All-Powerful Allah,
Who rules all of nature… In short, life and all living things were created.
This is not a dogmatic belief like materialism, but a plain fact revealed by
scientific observation and experiment.
We see that this fact comes as a terrible shock for scientists who are
used to believing in materialism, and that materialism is a science. See
how this shock is described by Michael Behe, one of the most important
scientists to stand against the theory of evolution in the world today:
The resulting realization that life was designed by an intelligence is a shock
to us in the twentieth century who have gotten used to thinking of life as the
result of simple natural laws. But other centuries have had their shocks, and
there is no reason to suppose that we should escape them. 390

Mankind has been freed from such dogmas as that the world is flat,
or that it is the center of the universe. And it is now being freed from the
materialist and evolutionist dogma that life came about by itself.
The duty that befalls a true scientist in this respect, is to do away
with materialist dogma and evaluate the origin of life and living things
with the honesty and objectivity befitting a real scientist. A real scientist
must come to terms with the "shock," and not tie himself to outdated
nineteenth-century dogmas and defend impossible scenarios.

316