Page 205 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

m
t
e
p
t
o
t

t
i
s
i
n
t

A
s
’
r

e
i
M
i
c
a
g
h
p
r

S
e

T
a
d
w
r
a
D Darwinists’ Attempt to Spread Their Magic
u
r
s
P
l
a

n
a
a
d
p
o
g
a
h
t
S Spells with Visual Propaganda
p
l
e
w
i

i
V
l
s

Darwinists possess not one shred of scientific evidence with which
to support their theories. The fictitious process that, according to evo-
lutionists, took place over millions of years, should have left behind
countless traces and remains in the fossil record. But in reality, not one
fossil indicates that any such process ever happened. This lack of fossil
evidence is so complete that Darwinists have not a single specimen of
an intermediate-form fossil, though countless fossil remains show that
living things have remained unchanged for millions of years, ever since
they were created.
This lack of evidence has impelled Darwinists to give the impres-
sion that imaginary fossils actually exist. Since they cannot submit any
real evidence, Darwinists instead resort to deceiving people through vi-
sual propaganda and indoctrination. One such technique involves re-
constructions.
The word reconstruction means “rebuilding” a model or drawing
of a life form on the basis of a few fragments of bone. During this com-
pletely one-sided process, various fossil discoveries are interpreted in
an utterly distorted manner. For example, a life form’s entire family
will be reconstructed and its social life depicted in great detail. Yet such
detailed reconstructions may sometimes be based on no more than a
single molar tooth or arm bone. What emerges is completely the result
of the imagination of the artist creating the reconstruction, which con-
stitutes no new evidence at all. All the “ape-men” depicted in the me-
dia to date have all been reconstructions.
Using the same bone fragments, different artists may also come up
with completely different life forms, because from looking at bone frag-
ments alone, there is no way of determining what a life form’s soft tis-
sues were like. Indeed, the fossil fragments obtained by evolutionists
generally consist of no more than part of the facial bones, a section of
203