Page 210 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Harun Yahya

lump into bones and clothed the bones in flesh; and then brought him
into being as another creature. Blessed be Allah, the Best of Creators!
(Surat al-Muminun, 12-14)

H

S
a
s
l
u
v
o
t
n

i
o
o
r
e
h
e
s
t
n
d
a
M

n
A

y
E
h
W Why Evolution Has So Many Adherents

y
Darwinists’ best-known method of deceiving people, but perhaps
one of their greatest errors, is in claiming to be a majority. Darwinists im-
ply that their theory is true by maintaining that the great majority of sci-
entists—and society as a whole—subscribe to the theory of evolution.
Arda Denkel, a professor of philosophy and evolutionist scientist
from Bogaziçi University in Istanbul, sets out the baseless illogicality of
the indoctrination, stating that “because so many people accept it, the
theory of evolution must be true”:
Will the fact that large number of eminent individuals and institutions are
in favor of evolution prove the concept of the theory of evolution to be
true? Or will the concept be confirmed by virtue of a judicial court ver-
dict?. . . “The Concept of Evolution is supported by all leading scientists
in Turkey, by the presidents of TUBA and TUBITAK [official scientific in-
stitutions], university rectors and deans.” The support of such respected
individuals is of course an excellent thing. But is it acceptance by re-
spected and powerful individuals that confirms the truth of something? I
would like to recall one historical event. Did not Galileo state and defend
the truth against all the eminent individuals, lawyers and, particularly,
scientists of his time? Did other proceedings in the courts of the
Inquisition not produce a similar picture? The support of respected and
esteemed bodies is not something that creates the truth, and is not direct-
ly connected to scientific accuracy. 77
The fact that Darwinism was once accepted by a majority stems
from people failing to evaluate what they were told, to their unques-
tioning acceptance of superficial accounts of evolution given, and the
implicit threat that “Anyone who does not believe in evolution is not
scientific.”
208