Page 207 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

These reconstructions have no scientific validity and contribute
nothing in the way of evidence for evolution. They are all fantasies
dreamed up to convince people that semi-ape, semi-human beings
once lived in the past.
But no matter how much Darwinists attempt to mislead through
reconstructions, they have no evidence to indicate the validity of evo-
lution. Meaningless reconstructions may once have influenced the pub-
lic, but most people now realize that the ape-men depicted in newspa-
pers and magazines are mere fantasies. They now have comprehensive

information on the subject, and all the answers to refute evolutionist
claims. They know that the ape-men in question never existed. They
have realized that humans, like all other living things, never under-
went evolution, and that the images they see are scientifically worth-
less. They can now see through all the deceptive methods employed by
evolutionists.

It is astonishing that over a billion fossils have been found, yet
there is no undisputed transitional form between very different
types of animals or even animal features (such as a reptile’s scale
turning into a bird’s feather). How can we say that evolution (the
idea that man is the result of slow changes over time from earlier
creatures) be considered a reasonable theory in light of this lack
of evidence? 76
Richard L. Kleiss, author

205