Page 206 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider
P. 206

Harun Yahya


































                                             Reconstructions, sometimes produced on the ba-
                                             sis of a single arm bone or a single tooth, are ex-
                                             amples of a terrible deception. Despite the impos-
                                             sibility of identifying soft tissue, fictitious ape-like
                                             humans are depicted in their social habitats, and
                                             this is depicted as fact in the evolutionist press.




               the vertebrae or even a single bone and on occasion, even one single
               tooth. (Nebraska Man, his family, and his social life were all recon-
               structed based on the discovery of just one tooth. The tooth in question

               was given the name of “Nebraska Man,” though there was no fossil ev-
               idence to indicate any of that life form’s distinguishing features.
                   Shortly afterwards, however, it was established that the tooth in
               question actually belonged to a wild boar. This depiction of an imagi-
               nary humanoid took its place alongside all the other evolutionary

               frauds. This is a significant example of the kind of deception that
               Darwinists turn to in their reconstructions, drawings and models that
               evolutionists can interpret exactly as they wish.



                                              204
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211