Page 101 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 101

Origin of the Bird Feathers  99



           far too com plex to be ex plained by  the feath er its aer o dy nam ic prop er -
           means of any ev o lu tion a ry proc ess.  ties.  Even  more  in ter est ing ly,  on
           The well known or ni thol o gist Alan  each barb are even small er struc -
           Feduccia does not con sid er it prob a -  tures known as bar bul es, too small
           ble that a tis sue so well suit ed for  to be seen with the na ked eye. On all
           flight could have emerged in i tial ly  of these bar bul es are ti ny hooks,
           to serve an oth er pur pose (for ex am -  thanks to which the bar bul es are
           ple, in su la tion, as is claimed by ev o -  held to geth er tight ly, as if by zip -
           lu tion ists). As he says: "Everything  pers.
           about them in di cates an aer o dy nam -  There are 650 barbs on ei ther side
           ic func tion... They're light weight,  of a stork feath er's stem. Each one
           they're ex cel lent air foils, they pro -  has  600  con tra posed  bar bul es,  at -
           duce high lift at low speeds, and   tached to one an oth er by 390 hooks
           they have a Velcro-like qual i ty that  which, again, cling to geth er like the
           lets them be re as sem bled."  95   two sides of a zip per. If the hooks
              In ad di tion, a long, stiff tube runs  be come de tached from one an oth er,
           along the cen ter of the feath er. From  the bird has on ly to shake it self or
           both sides of this tube emerge hun -  groom its feath ers with its beak for
           dreds of barbs. These barbs, which  them to re at tach.
                 have dif fer ing lengths and de -  To main tain that such a com plex
                        grees of soft ness, give  struc ture evolved as the re sult of
                                               ran dom  mu ta tions  from  rep tile
                                               scales is sim ply a dog mat ic be lief,
                                               based on no sci en tif ic foun da tion at
                                               all.


                                               The scales cov er ing the bod ies of rep -
                                               tiles are dif fer ent from bird feath ers in
                                               ev ery re spect. Unlike feath ers, scales
                                               do not ex tend be neath the skin, con -
                                               sist ing sole ly of a hard lay er on the
                                               sur face of on an i mal's skin. They bear
                                               no re sem blance to bird feath ers, ge net -
                                               i cal ly, bi o chem i cal ly, nor an a tom i cal ly.
                                               This enor mous dif fer ence be tween
                                               scales and feath ers whol ly in val i dates
                                               the sce nar io of ev o lu tion from rep tiles
                                               to birds.
           Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106