Page 264 - Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System

Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System

stunned at how he ever espoused such nonsense for maybe as long as
150 years. He will be ashamed of having fallen for the Darwinist spell
and supported a lie. Even the most fanatical Darwinists feel that today.
One can see this from various statements and sense their skepticism.
Some of them even admit that explicitly. But it is never too late to aban-
don a false belief and accept the truth. Admitting the truth and aban-
doning one’s errors is a great virtue. The correct thing to do after seeing

the scientific evidence is to openly admit that Darwinism is utter non-
sense.

Acceptance after Denial
The admission that Darwinists fail to hide behind their language
of denial is expressed as follows by various scientists and Darwinists

themselves.
Biologist William Fix:
Scientists at the forefront of inquiry have put the knife to classical
Darwinism. They have not gone public with this news, but have kept it
in their technical papers and inner counsels. 162
Darwinist anthropologist Robert A. Martin:

In 1972 Niles Eldredge of the American Museum of Natural History and
Steven Jay Gould of Harvard University published a paper introducing
the concept of “punctuated equilibrium.” If evolution progresses in a
slow, methodical, and gradual fashion, they asked, where are all the fossil
intermediates between species? Perhaps they are difficult to find because
they do not exist. 163
Darwinist T. H. Frazzetta from the University of Illinois Ecology
Department:

With each passing year the once rather simplistic views on evolution con-
tinue to crumble. 164
French Darwinist Jean Pierre Lehman:
Darwinism in its ancient and classical form has broken down. 165

262