Page 443 - Corporate Finance PDF Final new link
P. 443

NPP













                  BRILLIANT’S                       Capital Budgeting                               443


                    III  PV of Terminal Inflow:
                         Realization of Salvage Value                                           1,20,000
                         Realization of Working Capital                                          65,000
                                                                                                1,85,000
                         × PV Factor @ 10% for 4th year                                          × 0.683
                                                                                                1,26,355
                    IV   Computation of NPV:
                         PV (Inflows)                                                        3,30,472.50
                         Less: PV (Outflows)                                                    1,26,355
                                                                            NPV                46,827.50

                      Since, the NPV is positive, the proposal is acceptable.
                  Working Note:
                      1. Calculation of Depreciation
                                               Cost   Salvage Value  3,45,000 1,20,000
                                 Depreciation =                   =                   =    ` 56,250
                                                  Estimated Life            4
                   Illustration 5.1.14
                      A company is considering which of two mutually exclusive projects it should undertake. The
                  Finance Director thinks that the project with the higher NPV should be chosen whereas the
                  Managing Director thinks that the one with the higher IRR should be undertaken especially as
                  both projects have the same initial outlay and length of life. The company anticipates a cost of
                  capital of 10% and after tax the net cash flows of the projects are as follows:
                      EH$ H§$nZr {dMma H$a ahr h¡ {H$ Xmo nañna g§~§{YV àmoOo³Q²>g ‘| go Bgo {H$gH$mo boZm Mm{hE& ’$m¶Z|g S>m¶ao³Q>a H$m
                  {dMma h¡ {H$ A{YH$ NPV Ho$ gmW àmoOo³Q> H$m MwZmd {H$¶m OmZm Mm{hE O~{H$ ‘¡ZoqOJ S>m¶ao³Q>a H$m {dMma h¡ {H$ A{YH$
                  IRR dmbm boZm Mm{hE, {deof ê$n go O~ XmoZm| àmoOo³Q²>g H$m g‘mZ B{Z{e¶b AmCQ>bo VWm OrdZH$mb h¡& H§$nZr H¡${nQ>b
                  H$s bmJV H$m 10% H$m AZw‘mZ bJmVr h¡ VWm Q>¡³g Ho$ níMmV² àmoOo³Q²>g H$m ZoQ> H¡$e âbmo {ZåZ{b{IV h¡…

                  Year / df©                  0          1            2           3        4          5


                  (Cash Flows Figs. in, 000)
                  (H¡$e âbmo AmH§$‹S>o, 000 ‘|)
                  Project X / àmoOo³Q> X   (200)        35           80          90       75         20
                  Project Y / àmoOo³Q> Y   (200)       218           10          10        4          3

                      Required / Amdí¶H$ h¡:
                      (a) Calculate the NPV and IRR of each project. / à˶oH$ àmoOo³Q> H$s NPV VWm IRR H$r JUZm&

                      (b) State, with reasons, which project you would recommend.
                          H$maU g{hV ~VmB¶o Amn {H$g àmoOo³Q> H$m gwPmd X|Jo&
   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448