Page 365 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat
P. 365

364    Part 4   •  Leading
                                                                                  them and how they’ll be evaluated? Finally, the
                                                                                  theory is concerned with perceptions. Reality is
                                                                                  irrelevant.  An individual’s own perceptions of
                                                                                  performance, reward, and goal outcomes, not the
                                                                                  outcomes themselves, will determine his or her
                                                                                  motivation (level of effort).

                                                                                  How Can We Integrate
               Chen Wen/ColorChinaPhoto/Associated Press                          Contemporary Motivation Theories?


                                                                                  Many of the ideas underlying the contempo-
                                                                                  rary motivation theories are complementary,
                                                                                  and you’ll understand better how to motivate
                                                                                                                       37
                                                                                  people if you see how the theories fit together.
                                                                                  Exhibit  11–9  presents  a  model  that  integrates
                                                                                  much of what we know about motivation. Its
                                                                                  basic foundation is the expectancy model. Let’s
                                                                                  work through the model, starting on the left.
                Foxconn chairman and founder Terry Gou   •  The individual effort box has an arrow leading into it. This arrow flows from the individ-
                (center) honored 140 employees in Shenzhen,
                China, for their excellent performance at an   ual’s goals. Consistent with goal-setting theory, this goals-effort link is meant to illustrate
                awards and recognition banquet for them   that goals direct behavior.
                and their relatives. Recognition programs   •  Expectancy theory predicts that an employee will exert a high level of effort if he or she per-
                that express appreciation for a job well done
                play a powerful role in motivating appropriate   ceives a strong relationship between effort and performance, performance and rewards, and
                employee behavior.              rewards and satisfaction of personal goals. Each of these relationships is, in turn, influenced
                                                by certain factors. You can see from the model that the level of individual performance is
                                                determined not only by the level of individual effort but also by the individual’s ability to
                                                perform and by whether the organization has a fair and objective performance evaluation
                                                system. The performance-reward relationship will be strong if the individual perceives that
                                                it is performance (rather than seniority, personal favorites, or some other criterion) that is
                                                rewarded. The final link in expectancy theory is the rewards-goal relationship.
                                              •  The traditional need theories come into play at this point. Motivation would be high to the
                                                degree that the rewards an individual received for his or her high performance satisfied the
                                                dominant needs consistent with his or her individual goals.

                                              A closer look at the model also shows that it considers other theories.
                                              •  Achievement-need is seen, in that the high achiever isn’t motivated by the organization’s
                                                assessment of his or her performance or organizational rewards, hence the jump from effort
                                                to individual goals for those with a high nAch. Remember that high achievers are internally
                                                driven as long as the jobs they’re doing provide them with personal responsibility, feed-
                                                back, and moderate risks. They’re not concerned with the effort-performance, performance-
                                                reward, or rewards-goals linkages.
                                              •  Reinforcement theory is seen in the model by recognizing that the organization’s rewards
                                                reinforce the individual’s performance. If managers have designed a reward system that is
                                                seen by employees as “paying off” for good performance, the rewards will reinforce and
                                                encourage continued good performance.
                                              •  Rewards also play a key part in equity theory. Individuals will compare the rewards (out-
                                                comes) they have received from the inputs or efforts they made with the inputs-outcomes
                                                ratio of relevant others. If inequities exist, the effort expended may be influenced.
                                              •  Finally, the JCM is seen in this integrative model. Task characteristics (job design)  influence
                                                job motivation at two places. First, jobs that are designed around the five job dimensions
                                                are likely to lead to higher actual job performance because the individual’s motivation will
                                                be stimulated by the job itself—that is, they will increase the linkage between effort and
                                                performance. Second, jobs that are designed around the five job dimensions also  increase
                                                an employee’s control over key elements in his or her work. Therefore, jobs that  offer
                                                autonomy, feedback, and similar task characteristics help to satisfy the individual goals of
                                                employees who desire greater control over their work.
   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370