Page 50 - 01 The Opening Vision
P. 50

DANIEL AND THE REVELATION-Uriah Smith

                                 ~The Response of History to the Revelation~

                                          Chapter 1 – The Opening Vision
                   And  what  still  further  disproves  the  claim


               here set up in behalf of the first day, is the fact


               that neither the Father nor the Son has ever


               claimed the first day as his own in any higher


               sense  than  he  has  each  or  any  of  the  other


               laboring days. Neither of them has ever placed



               any blessing upon it, or attached any sanctity


               to it. If it was to be called the Lord’s day from


               the  fact  of  Christ’s  resurrection  upon  it,


               Inspiration would doubtless have somewhere


               so  informed  us.  But  there  are  other  events


               equally essential to the plan of salvation, as,


               for instance, the crucifixion and the ascension;


               and in the absence of all instruction upon the


               point, why not call the day upon which either


               of these occurred, the Lord’s day, as well as the


               day upon which he rose from the dead?
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55