Page 50 - 01 The Opening Vision
P. 50
DANIEL AND THE REVELATION-Uriah Smith
~The Response of History to the Revelation~
Chapter 1 – The Opening Vision
And what still further disproves the claim
here set up in behalf of the first day, is the fact
that neither the Father nor the Son has ever
claimed the first day as his own in any higher
sense than he has each or any of the other
laboring days. Neither of them has ever placed
any blessing upon it, or attached any sanctity
to it. If it was to be called the Lord’s day from
the fact of Christ’s resurrection upon it,
Inspiration would doubtless have somewhere
so informed us. But there are other events
equally essential to the plan of salvation, as,
for instance, the crucifixion and the ascension;
and in the absence of all instruction upon the
point, why not call the day upon which either
of these occurred, the Lord’s day, as well as the
day upon which he rose from the dead?