Page 425 - Krugmans Economics for AP Text Book_Neat
P. 425

its productivity by adopting technology that had been developed in the United
                                                                                         According to the convergence
             States, Europe, and Japan over the previous century. This was aided by a huge in-
                                                                                         hypothesis, international differences
             vestment in human capital through widespread schooling.                     in real GDP per capita tend to narrow
               The East Asian experience demonstrates that economic growth can be especially  over time.
             fast in countries that are playing catch -up to other countries with higher GDP per
             capita. On this basis, many economists have suggested a general principle known as
             the convergence hypothesis. It says that differences in real GDP per capita among
             countries tend to narrow over time because countries that start with lower real GDP                       Section 7 Economic Growth and Productivity
             per capita tend to have higher growth rates. We’ll look at the evidence for the conver-
             gence hypothesis later in this section.
               Even before we get to that evidence, however, we can say right away that starting
             with a relatively low level of real GDP per capita is no guarantee of rapid growth, as the
             examples of Latin America and Africa both demonstrate.

             Latin America’s Disappointment
             In 1900, Latin America was not regarded as an economically backward region. Natural
             resources, including both minerals and cultivatable land, were abundant. Some coun-
             tries, notably Argentina, attracted millions of immigrants from Europe in search of a
             better life. Measures of real GDP per capita in Argentina, Uruguay, and southern Brazil
             were comparable to those in economically advanced countries.
               Since about 1920, however, growth in Latin America has been disappointing. As Fig-
             ure 38.3 shows in the case of Argentina, it has remained disappointing to this day. The
             fact that South Korea is now much richer than Argentina would have seemed incon-
             ceivable a few generations ago.
               Why has Latin America stagnated? Comparisons with East
             Asian success stories suggest several factors. The rates of sav-
             ings and investment spending in Latin America have been
             much lower than in East Asia, partly as a result of irresponsi-
             ble government policy that has eroded savings through high
             inflation, bank failures, and other disruptions. Education—
             especially broad basic education—has been underemphasized:
             even Latin American nations rich in natural resources often
             failed to channel that wealth into their educational systems.
             And political instability, leading to irresponsible economic  David R. Frazier Photolibrary, Inc./Alamy
             policies, has taken a toll.
               In the 1980s, many economists came to believe that Latin
             America was suffering from excessive government intervention
             in markets. They recommended opening the economies to im-
             ports, selling off government - owned companies, and, in general, freeing up individual  Relatively low rates of savings, invest-
             initiative. The hope was that this would produce an East Asian–type economic surge.  ment spending, and education, along
                                                                                         with political instability, have hampered
             So far, however, only one Latin American nation, Chile, has achieved rapid growth. It  economic growth in Latin America.
             now seems that pulling off an economic miracle is harder than it looks.

             Africa’s Troubles

                                                                              1
             Africa south of the Sahara is home to about 780 million people, more than 2 ⁄2 times
             the population of the United States. On average, they are very poor, nowhere close to
             U.S. living standards 100 or even 200 years ago. And economic progress has been both
             slow and uneven, as the example of Nigeria, the most populous nation in the region,
             suggests. In fact, real GDP per capita in sub - Saharan Africa actually fell 13 percent
             from 1980 to 1994, although it has recovered since then. The consequence of this poor
             growth performance has been intense and continuing poverty.
               This is a very disheartening picture. What explains it?
               Perhaps first and foremost is the problem of political instability. In the years since
             1975, large parts of Africa have experienced savage civil wars (often with outside powers



                                                                    module 38      Productivity and Growth      383
   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430