Page 30 - The Edge - Spring 2018
P. 30

BY JESSICA SANCHEZ
                            Arizona Court of Appeals Ruling: You Can’t Hide


                            Public Records by Using Private Devices and Accounts



            Jessica Sanchez

              On December 7, 2017, the Arizona
            Court of Appeals issued a ruling holding
            that a “public employee’s private cell phone
            records pertaining to the conduct of public
            business may become public records subject
            to disclosure if a public records requestor
            establishes the employee used the cell phone
            for a public purpose.”
              This ruling from the Arizona Court of
            Appeals supersedes a July 2017 Attorney
            General Opinion, which stated that “[m]essages
            sent or received by a private electronic device
            or through a private social media account
            implicate the public o   cial’s duty to provide a
            reasonable account of o   cial conduct, but do
            not themselves harbor public records.” [Note:
               e Attorney General was still careful in his
            opinion to remind public o   cials that they                                             ILLUSTRATION/jamesteohart
            cannot conceal o   cial conduct by using private devices.]  and the like, are not subject to a public records request. [Note: Records
              So, what does this ruling mean? Essentially, the ruling from  that contain both private and work-related content may have to be
            the Arizona Court of Appeals means that, unlike what was opined  turned over in their entirety or may be subject to court review to
            this summer by the Arizona Attorney General, you will not be able  determine what is and is not considered to be a public record].
            to avoid disclosing records of your o   cial duties simply because   So what now? If employees are going to use or are permitted
            the records were created using your private devices or your private  to use their private cell phones, tablets, iPads, home computers,
            accounts.                                              personal social media accounts to conduct work related business,
              Some examples of public records that may be contained on  employees should be:
            your private devices or in your private accounts include, but are   • In-serviced about records retention guidelines and should be
            not limited to: a text message conversation about the discipline  reminded not to delete public records before allowable under the
            of an employee, emails sent and received on your personal email  appropriate retention schedule.
            accounts when your work email was not working, calendars on   • Reminded that it is NEVER allowable to delete public records
            your personal devices about work appointments and meetings,  to avoid disclosure.
            emails from a private account requesting agenda items for a Board   • Made aware that personal devices can be required to be turned
            meeting, and so on ...                                 over for the time it takes to copy the work-related information so
              If you use your personal cell phone, computer, social media  that it can be disclosed to the person requesting the information.
            accounts, and the like, to conduct your o   cial duties, then you   • Reminded that when an email, text, SnapChat, etc. contains
            create the possibility that you may have to turn over records from  both personal and work-related information, the WHOLE thing
            your private devices and accounts pursuant to a public records  may have to be disclosed, not just the work-related portion.
            request. You also create a practical and legal problem if you do not   Or, in light of the recent ruling, maybe this is a good time to
            accurately maintain records of your o   cial duties and activities.   remind employees to keep their work and personal life separate.
              So, what does the ruling not mean?    e ruling from the Arizona
            Court of Appeals doesn’t open your purely private records and  Jessica Sanchez is a member of the School Law section,
            communications to the public. Whether you use your personal or  representing Udall Shumway’s education law clients throughout
            government devices and accounts, purely private, records, for example,  Arizona. If you have questions about public records or other
            your grocery list, your text messages about who will pick up the kids,  education law concerns, please contact Ms. Sanchez at (480) 461-
            your email wishing a co-worker a happy birthday or successful surgery,  5374 or jss@udallshumway.com.


           30                                                                           THE EDGE              SPRING 2018

                                                                                        THE EDGE  |
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35