Page 6 - NGTU_paper_withoutVideo
P. 6

Modern Geomatics Technologies and Applications

          each LSE estimation method gets a validity according to the root mean square error (RMSE) obtained from the LSE product of
          a given sensor from Equation (1).
                     ∑ m   (      )                                                  1
                      j=1
                           j
                              ij
             (        )  =       ; (   = 1, … ,   ;    = 1, … ,   )       =                                       (1)
                        ∑ m      j                                    ℎ                    j  [        (         −                 )]   
                         j=1
                                                                                     ij
                                                                                           i
                    (VAvg)                                            CM                               Sensor
            where, εi   is the emissivity of the ith pixel for the VAvg method, εij   is the coordinate matching of εij and εi   which
          in this study is obtained by (3) and RMSE is achieved by the comparison of the emissivity of each method with the LSE product
          of a given sensor. Indeed, Vj is the validity of the jth method for the whole image pixels. Evidently, each method may have
          appropriate potentials, according to its condition and assumption to yield the emissivity of special classes properly. Hence, the
                                                           CBVA
          emissivity of the ith pixel in class k by the CBVA method, εik  , is obtained from Equation (2).
                                  

                      ∑ m   (      )                                      1
                            kj
                       j=1
                                ij
              (        )  =        ; (k = 1, … , nC)          ℎ               =                                              (2)
                         ∑ m      kj                               [        (       −    −                 )]   
                          j=1
                                                                         ij
                                                                                 i
                                                                                   CM-k  is coordinate matching of εij of
            where, WKj is the validity  of the jth method for class k, nC is the class number and εij
                    Sensor                                                   CM           CM-k
          class k and εi   which in this study is obtained by (6). It is worthy to note that εij   in (3) and εij   in (4) should have the
                                                                                                 CM-k  should be the
          same geographic coordinate matching as sensor data. In other words, the spatial and spectral resolution of εij
                 sensor
          same as εi  . The corresponding validity  in the VAvg (1) and CBVA (2) methods express the impact of the each LSE method
          in the knowledge based schemes (i.e. the LSE method with the highest validity  has the greatest affect, and vice versa). It is
          worthy  to  note  that  the  VAvg  and  CBVA  methods  calculate  equal  validity  for  pixels  of  the  whole  image  and  each  class,
          respectively. It is worth noting that the corresponding validity in VAvg and CBVA methods are dynamic and adaptively are
          computed for each individual LSE method in a given scene. In other words, the assigned validity to the individual LSE methods
          can change with land cover variation and various individual methods of LSE.
             In this study, the LSE product of MODIS (MOD11_L2) was used as the knowledge to calculate the validity. MOD11_L2 is
          an LST/E product that has been achieved via the CBEM at 1 km spatial resolution [31].In order to utilizes product of MODIS,
          three issues of viewing angle effect, time and coordinate matching against LDCM data should be addressed. In calculating the
          weight of methods, the MODIS viewing angle effect on the LSE was skipped. Since, the LSE is almost time invariant, the LSE
          of the MODIS product possibly close to the overpass time of LDCM was selected. In the coordinate matching task, the LSE of
          LDCM data and LSE product of MODIS must be aggregated to the same spatial and spectral resolution. For spatial resolution,
          an area-weighted algorithm is employed according [32] to TIRS of LDCM data. Moreover, the spectral relationship between the
          emissivity of the corresponding TIR channels of the LDCM and MODIS data was calculated from Equation (3).
                                                  = 0.9662           (  10)  + 0.0337
                                          {                              }            (3)
                                                  = 0.9964           (  11)  +  0.0036
                                                
                                                             
                       TIRS     TIRS                                CM      CM
               where, ε10   and ε11   of the LDCM data are corresponding to ε 31 and ε32  of the MODIS data, respectively. To solve
          (3), the spectral emissivities, including water, vegetation, soil, minerals, man-made and so on (extracted from the University of
          California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) MODIS emissivity library) were convolved with the spectral response functions (SRF) of the
          corresponding thermal bands of LDCM and MODIS.
          3.  Materials
           3.1.  Research area
                                                                       2
            The study area is an arid and semi-arid region with an area of 226255 km , which is has various climate types with a diverse
          land cover including mixed pixels covered by different vegetation, soil, and rocky types. It lies between latitudes 26° 25'–32°
          44'N and longitudes 50° 32'–55° 54'E. The land use/land cover data including seventeen classes and two scenes of LDCM data,
          Level 1T, captured on 14 and 21 June 2013 are shown in Fig. 1 (Because the LSE product of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal
          Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) was purchased as validation data in 2013, LDCM data were obtained on the same
          date).












                                                                                                               3
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11