Page 11 - Professorial Lecture - Professor P van Rooyen
P. 11

The ideal for a university is governance of the self – providing individuals
               and collectives with a vocabulary and various techniques via which they can
               relate  to  and  control  themselves  (Dean,  1999).  Foucault  presented  the
               perspective  of  “govern-mentality”  (Foucault,  1978).  Here  freedom  and
               steering not only co-exist, but shape each other. Govern-mentality is the
               government  of  the  self,  a  mentality  to  self-government.  In  this  way  it
               constructs individuals who are capable of choice and action, shapes them as
               active subjects, and seeks to align their choices with set objectives. If this
               freedom and capacity for choice is abolished, there can be no steering – only
               coercion. Govern-mentality thus assumes that steering (government) takes
               place through the freedom to decide, and indeed targets the freedom of the
               governed by attempting to align the goals of the governed with the goal of
               governing.

               These changes mean an increasing focus on professionalization. The reform
               implied  an  entirely  new  way  of  ‘thinking  university’,  namely  a  more
               instrumental  view,  where  the  state-university  relationship  is  contractual
               and change reflects a continuous calculation of relative performance and
               costs, and the University, or some of its parts, will be disposed of if there are
               more efficient ways to achieve shifting objectives (Olsen, 2005).

               Since taking over from the state of nature the modern State apparatus is
               notorious for restricting the liberties of the individual. This can be more or
               less restrictive, up to the point of structural violence. According to Galtung,
               structural violence can be significantly reduced only in a context of more
               individual  freedom  and  autonomy  (See  Dilts,  2012).  The  democratic
               imperative is clear: the State should not try to engage and confine the social
               and  private  spaces  within  which  individuals  and  communities  live  and
               function.

               I propose the vision of the ideal university as a competitive university.  It is
               a  university  that  is  designed  –  with  national  interests  in  mind  –  to  act
               dynamically and strategically  on  a new global market  characterized by  a
               knowledge economy agenda. The competitive  university  must service its
               customers by providing the services (education, research, candidates, etc.)



                                                                          9 |
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16