Page 521 - INDIANNAVYV1
P. 521

HISTORY OF TDE INDIAN NAVY.           489
      his labours from a Service which was so much degraded.  Now
      he would tell the Court what the reason of this degradation
      was.  The fact was plainly this  : The Bombay Marine was not
      represented on the other side of the bar; but the other service
      —the merchant service—was  so rei)resented  ; for he  believed
      that no less than four Directors had been  captains of East
      Indiamen. Those captains came constantly within the inlluence
      of the Court  of Directors, but the  captains  in  the Marine
      service were quite removed beyond that influence."
        The Cliairnian of the Court of Directors, in reply, entered
      into a lengthened defence of the conduct of the late Superin-
      tendent, Mr. Meriton, and  stated that " for a great length of
      time, he admitted even for years, the Court had been sedulously
      engaged  in endeavouring  to  effect  the improvement of  the
      Bombay Marine, and that many difficulties had occurred in the
      progress of their efforts for that purpose;  difficulties occasioned
      by the peculiarity of the naval  service of this country, which
      entertained a kind of Jealous}' of any interference on naval
      subjects."  He did justice to the character and conduct of the
      Bombay Marine, but denied that it was neglected, saying that
      the Court had " gratuitously" increased the emoluments of the
      officers since the year 1798, when the gallant officer and others
      had  entered  the  Service.  He  concluded by moving: —  '-It
      having been declared from the Chair, that measures are in  j>ro-
      gress for iinproving the condition of the J^ombay Marine, and
      for placing  it on a footing more consonant  to the merits and
      services of that distinguished corps, this Court is disposed to
      give confidence to the correctness of the statement thus given
      from the Chair, and considers  it, therefore, both injudicious and
      inexpedient to force a premature discussion of the subji-ct on
      this Court, until the details of the ])roposed plan come regularly
      before  it."
        Tiie Deputy Chairman (the Hon. II. Tjindsay, M.P.) seconded
      this amendment, and did justice to the "able and  effective
      manner in which the Marine performed its duty."  Sir ('. Forbes
      advised Captain Maxfield  to withdraw  his motion, and, after
      paying a high  tribute  to  his honoiu'able and  disinterested
                       —
      conduct, continued  :  " He concurred  in  all that was said, on
      each side of the bar, as to the merits of the Bond)ay Marine. He
      believed that a more deserving set of men, as j)idilic servants,
      did not exist, and he was only sorry thai rircumstani'es did not
      allow them to have done as much  as,  lie was sure, they could
      have done.  He greatly regretted that some mark of distijiction
      had not been granted to officers who had so greatly signalized
      themselves.  With respect to Connnodore Hayes, every j)erson
      who knew him would admit,  that  he was one  of  the most
      disinterested men in the world; and he believed that the order
      which he issued in reference to the (.'hina junks, was one that
   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526