Page 217 - Records of Bahrain (7) (ii)_Neat
P. 217

Bahrain-Qatar seabed, 1951-1960              607
                                  COIOTPWTAT.
     (BA 1531/15)                                 FOREIGN OFFICE, G*W*1*
                                                      May 17, I960*

             /Vly


               Wo huvo 1)0011 thinking about your lotto?* of April 19
          (1531/3), together with Ford1o of April 12 (1531/3) and
          Moborly'o two lottoro of April 20 (1271/600) uhout  tho
          l'ahruli%/Qotur oca-hod boundary*
          2. The determining fact, ocomn to ho that In liio prooent
          frame of mind tho Ruler of Bahruln will not give even a
          tacit approval to any modification of tho 1947 lino which wo
          (lot alone tho Ruler of Qatar) could conceivably accept* I ara
          Inclined to think therefore that tho next move In the game ohould
          ho oImply to speak to him ,on the following lines* Her Majesty’s
          Government have carefully (considcrcd tho alignment of tho sea-hod
          houndary which ohould ho allotted to Bahrain north of tho moot
          northerly point closerihod |in the 1947 letter. Thoy have
          taken into account the current median-line principles accepted
          In tho International Convention on tho Maritime Shelf of April
          1953, uni tl.cy have re-examined tho geographical dutu on which
          the 1947 lino was based. | They would he glad to discuss tho
          conclusions they )uivo Touched with tho Ruler hut if, mu ho
          indicated to Mr. Wiltshire at their mooting on April 13, tho
          Ruler does not fool able to ucccpt. tho idea that Internationally                i
          agreed prlnolplco ohould apply to Buhraln, there would soem little
          point in doing this. lion Mujooty’n Government therefore prefer
          to let tho matter root in the hope that tho Ruler may com©
          eventually on reflexion tc accept tlielr view that internationally
          agreed principles are tho best basis for an orderly settlement of
          problems like that of the sea-bed and should therefore he
          applied wherever possible. T do not think we ohoull go further
          than this at (ho next otufo*        j
          3* Such an approach would, however, imply that tho Ruler might
          hops for satisfaction of some kind !if hu nuboeq antly came tous
          in a hotter framo ol1 mind.’ Tn that event, in order to cue ape
          a charge of not practising what we preach, we might have to he
          prepared to reviso the 1947 line on the basis of the modJan lino
          prinoii)lt;0 accepted in tho International Convent ion on the Maritime
          Shelf of 191)6. (You will see that in tho ease of the boundary
          he two on Saudi Arabia uni tho ?uwnlt,-'taud1 Arabian Neutral Zone
          (our letter B 1531/20 of May 16 to you) we have preferred u line
          drawn on these principles thougi whether we could obtain it is
          vary doubtful).
          li. We would hopo, however, that rut! er than change tho 1947
          line on tho huolo of tho 1950 principles, thereby giving Bahrain
          additional uea-bed in the central area hut depriving her of some
          in the South and probubly in the Worth if tho 1947 lino wore
          prolonged beyond the northernmost ;.olnt so far defined (Bahrain
          Light Vcooo’l), the Ruler would consider tho 1947 award an
          "agreed" lino (as provided for under article 6 (1) of tlio 1950
          principles) and accept compensation in tho North on tho linoo
          suggested in paragraph 7 of Robert v/almoley’o letter of March 25

                                                           /(I-W 1531/13)


     !'• G. Q. Man, licq*,
          Bahrain.
                                  CONvTI)KRTTATf
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222